StugE needs a slight tone down
30 May 2014, 04:24 AM
#1
Posts: 612
I think for the cheapness the Stug E needs a slight tone down (not the previous useless ness). With the new explosives the Stug E just racks up kills easily and is rather accurate. I do not know of the explosives will be really looked at in the next patch, if so then that should do. But if not I think that a slight accuracy adjustment should be fine.
30 May 2014, 04:33 AM
#2
Posts: 2053
Anything less and it is useless once more. Any AT easily kills it, and it is super handicapped with a broken engine. Its a stug with even less AT and costs only a tad cheaper. Its fine, unless you want people arguing about the effectiveness of soviet AI tanks...
30 May 2014, 04:35 AM
#3
Posts: 2779
How about no?
30 May 2014, 05:38 AM
#4
Posts: 28
u guys just arent to be satisfied ... how about YOU adjust YOUR gameplay ?
SCARF GANG
♫
♫
30 May 2014, 05:45 AM
#5
Posts: 1130
I think for the cheapness the Stug E needs a slight tone down (not the previous useless ness). With the new explosives the Stug E just racks up kills easily and is rather accurate. I do not know of the explosives will be really looked at in the next patch, if so then that should do. But if not I think that a slight accuracy adjustment should be fine.
works just fine compared to the other AI tanks. no change is currently needed
horrida flamma bella
30 May 2014, 06:39 AM
#6
Posts: 1439
I do get the impression that it is a bit too effective at the moment, but it could be that Relic's idea behind this unit is to be on pair with KV-8 regarding AI capabilities. That said small adjustment won't hurt.
30 May 2014, 07:18 AM
#7
Posts: 2819
It is very effective when you put 6 shocks before a StugE.
But dude, you see the assgrens very early in the game, so you know the stugE is coming at 6 CP. Get a freakin' Zis out and the StugE can't do shit. StugE hasn't got big armor.
Yes it's good against infantry, but not too good.
Just get some support.
But dude, you see the assgrens very early in the game, so you know the stugE is coming at 6 CP. Get a freakin' Zis out and the StugE can't do shit. StugE hasn't got big armor.
Yes it's good against infantry, but not too good.
Just get some support.
All posts made are about situations in 2v2's. Not a 1v1 player.
30 May 2014, 08:23 AM
#8
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
It's fine as is.
30 May 2014, 09:08 AM
#9
Posts: 896
No, it doesn't need to be nerfed even slightly. It has 400 hit points so 1 at grenade and 2 zis shots or 2 guard squads with button or mark and its down. Plus people dont usually spam it like the Stug G because its pretty useless against tanks.
30 May 2014, 10:25 AM
#10
Posts: 1702
the stug E does not need a tone down in anti-inf.
What it needs is a tone down in anti tank capabilities.
Even tho it has low penetration for some reason it does 160 damage, which means that it needs only 4 penetrating shots to kill off a t-34/76.
That's a bit weird since PIV command tank does like 80? or even less damage...
so yeah, STUG e needs a damage nerf when it comes to armor, it should do a full 160 damage againts tanks... it should basically be a non turreted command tank when it comes to anti armor. I honestly think that this could of been a bug or something.
What it needs is a tone down in anti tank capabilities.
Even tho it has low penetration for some reason it does 160 damage, which means that it needs only 4 penetrating shots to kill off a t-34/76.
That's a bit weird since PIV command tank does like 80? or even less damage...
so yeah, STUG e needs a damage nerf when it comes to armor, it should do a full 160 damage againts tanks... it should basically be a non turreted command tank when it comes to anti armor. I honestly think that this could of been a bug or something.
30 May 2014, 10:29 AM
#11
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Umm, StuG-e does 80 damage.
Pretty much always did. With 40 penetration.
Pretty much always did. With 40 penetration.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
30 May 2014, 10:32 AM
#12
Posts: 1702
Umm, StuG-e does 80 damage.
Pretty much always did. With 40 penetration.
hmm, that's weird, i remember aproaching 2 stug-e assault guns with my t-34 and both of the shots penetrated (not very often it does that but still) and the t-34/76 went down from full to half health. Must of missed a pak somewhere there.
Oh, its fine then really.
30 May 2014, 10:50 AM
#13
Posts: 747
Stug-E is fine the way it is.
30 May 2014, 11:39 AM
#14
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
I have the same problem with the StugE as I do with other call-ins. They should require some sort of tech in addition to the CPs.
30 May 2014, 11:45 AM
#15
Posts: 52
I think for the cheapness the Stug E needs a slight tone down (not the previous useless ness). With the new explosives the Stug E just racks up kills easily and is rather accurate. I do not know of the explosives will be really looked at in the next patch, if so then that should do. But if not I think that a slight accuracy adjustment should be fine.
i bet you feel like this guy now
30 May 2014, 12:14 PM
#16
Posts: 1701
^xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
30 May 2014, 13:25 PM
#17
Posts: 612
Ok, I only thought if anything it only needed a slight adjustment but it seems I was wrong, I have just had extreme luck when using it and when facing it where it just always hits and kills 2-3 guys every shot. For 200 MP and 75 fuel it just seemed too effective for its cost but I guess not
30 May 2014, 14:47 PM
#18
Posts: 896
Ok, I only thought if anything it only needed a slight adjustment but it seems I was wrong, I have just had extreme luck when using it and when facing it where it just always hits and kills 2-3 guys every shot. For 200 MP and 75 fuel it just seemed too effective for its cost but I guess not
Remember, it's an anti infantry unit that comes late at cp6.
30 May 2014, 19:19 PM
#19
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
It´s fine. Next.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
5 Jun 2014, 10:43 AM
#20
Posts: 69
Permanently Bannedif anything that needs a tonedown its the screaming ability of soviet fanboy posters
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
63 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.263143.648+7
- 5.276110.715+14
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.250135.649+1
- 9.8119.810+1
- 10.13556.707+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
759
Board Info
476 users are online:
476 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
39 posts in the last week
128 posts in the last month
39 posts in the last week
128 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45117
Welcome our newest member, twicsyarbil
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, twicsyarbil
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM