Login

russian armor

Stug III e needs some love

21 Dec 2013, 17:41 PM
#41
avatar of Imagelessbean

Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1

IRL the Stug E was similar to the SU76, and the Stug G was the direct counterpart. In the game though since the SU76 struggles with armor it should be similar to Stug E.

Even though it is only in one doc (now) I would still like to see a free barrage ability added to the Stug E as I mentioned.

And yes indeed the name means assault gun.
24 Dec 2013, 20:04 PM
#42
avatar of DietBrownie

Posts: 308

i think the only reason why the stug III e is in the game is that relic heard players want new units, so they just shoved in a new one from ToW because for some reason they don't want to make any more new tanks.

it will be much better if it was replayed with a stuh, which was in action in stalingrad after all.


This, seriously. I don't think adding a stuh would be balanced, it would make the doctrine even more over powered
9 Dec 2014, 12:56 PM
#43
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959

So, since the last post was a year go, anyone has recently had any luck using this cute thing?
How does it perform anti-infantry or anti-armor?
I've used it just a few times and my opinion is that it seems it works well vs infantry, when I used it defensively, and can put some pressure on their armor, with pak40's support, plus it vets up fast
9 Dec 2014, 13:07 PM
#44
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

It's not for AT work.

However it counters the counters to assault genes and comes in the same doc.

People will often counter ass grens with Shocks and or T1, and it eats these.

Needs to be careful of real armour, real AT, conscripts with At grenades, zooks and sometimes PTRS.

A pair are standard in my BO for that commander.
9 Dec 2014, 13:09 PM
#45
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17889 | Subs: 8

It obliterates USF.
Nothing more needs to be said.
9 Dec 2014, 13:39 PM
#46
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

Well, if you guys all saying that it sucks, then maybe it's just me. Dunno, last time I used it (not recently though) it killed infantry like a meat grinder, but, again, maybe it's just me.
Anyway, it's role is not AT focused, but AI focused. So I wouldn't complain to much if it can't stand toe to toe with a T34...
9 Dec 2014, 13:41 PM
#47
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952

It obliterates USF.
Nothing more needs to be said.


Much like the M20 does to Ostheer.

That being said the Stug E needs some looking at... maybe 40 range + larger scatter.
9 Dec 2014, 13:48 PM
#48
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

its awesome now. worth it most of the time.
9 Dec 2014, 14:06 PM
#49
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

I like both the concept and the current state. It's a support vehicle, Get 1 or 2, Bring a Pak and wait for tiger. Although a little bit of AoE increase would be great.
9 Dec 2014, 14:08 PM
#50
avatar of TickTack

Posts: 578

Just ask your buddy to build a jagdtiger and barrage your foes to death.
9 Dec 2014, 14:17 PM
#51
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Buff this doctrinal Stug and you will see BP1 and then call in Stug and Tiger.
9 Dec 2014, 14:19 PM
#52
avatar of MarcoRossolini

Posts: 1042

I find reading this thread strange because everytime I've used the StuG E I've honestly been pleasantly surprised by its effectiveness, but then, I like spamming SU-76Ms, so ignore me.
9 Dec 2014, 14:20 PM
#53
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

This is a necroed thread, look at the date of complaints. Stug e has been buffed nicely since these complaints.
9 Dec 2014, 17:37 PM
#54
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

Yes, the person who necroed it did so explicitly to ask if it had been changed

It was more or less a joke before; now it is merely a well kept secret

It obliterates USF.
Nothing more needs to be said.


Unless they have bought bazookas, at which point it explodes messily
9 Dec 2014, 17:40 PM
#55
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

the stug E is no secret, and is batshit OP.
10 Dec 2014, 08:39 AM
#56
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

USF fucking hates it until they get jacksons out.
10 Dec 2014, 10:32 AM
#57
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

And against soviets it consistently takes out chunks of infantry, killing 2-4 models per shot (unless it completely misses).

New cover system is a great buff to Stugee.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

568 users are online: 1 member and 567 guests
Spielführer
11 posts in the last 24h
32 posts in the last week
145 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45040
Welcome our newest member, jacantonh81
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM