Login

russian armor

Will they address Panzergrens in the new patch?

PAGES (16)down
30 Dec 2020, 19:01 PM
#121
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1


Is it in this thread or not?

I'll ask again, why are you talking about penals. Not just as a matter of staying on topic, but pgrens don't have anywhere near the same drawbacks

You are talking about Penal not me, I am simply responding to your questions. If you do not want to talk about Penal simply do not ask me questions about them.

And no Penal do not have any drawbacks. Penal and PG are both imo "semi elite" infantry if one is available at minute 0 there is little reason for the other not be available at min 4.

(edited)
30 Dec 2020, 19:03 PM
#122
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:01 PMVipper

And no Penal do not any drawbacks.


Penals do not have any drawbacks? Are you serious? They are the infantry unit with the most drawbacks in all of COH2.
30 Dec 2020, 19:04 PM
#123
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1



Penals do not have any drawbacks? Are you serious? They are the infantry unit with the most drawbacks in all of COH2.

feel free to list them
30 Dec 2020, 19:05 PM
#124
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:04 PMVipper

feel free to list them


- no access to MG
- no access to AT-gun
- no access to indirect fire
- no access to effective AT
- no regular grenade
- no weapon upgrade
- bad scaling while being heavily outnumbered in the early game

30 Dec 2020, 19:07 PM
#125
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:01 PMVipper

You are talking about Penal not me.

You can't be serious

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Nov 2020, 10:05 AMVipper

And no Penal do not any drawbacks.

That is objectively not true
30 Dec 2020, 19:09 PM
#126
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1



- no access to MG
- no access to AT-gun
- no access to indirect fire
- no access to effective AT

Those are problems of the building not Penals


- no regular grenade

But the anti building tool that PG do not have.


- no weapon upgrade

Its called PTRS


- bad scaling

They have good vet bonuses that are superior to Panzerfüsilier up to vet 2 and inline with them at vet 3.
30 Dec 2020, 19:10 PM
#127
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:09 PMVipper

Those are problems of the building not Penals

Lol
30 Dec 2020, 19:14 PM
#128
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:09 PMVipper

Those are problems of the building not Penals


But the anti building tool that PG do not have.


Its called PTRS


They have good vet bonuses that are superior to Panzerfüsilier up to vet 2 and inline with them at vet 3.


PTRS is not a weapon upgrade, it's a mediocre sidegrade.

Saying all these things are just a problem of the tier building and not Penals themselves is true but I can't build Penals in other tier buildings so what is the point? Penals do have these drawbacks and there is no denying that. Only way to solve them is by going for a doctrine with dhsk/m42. It's simply not possible to get 3 Penals + T2 + Zis/Maxim as you will never have enough MP unless it's a complete noob stomp.
30 Dec 2020, 19:17 PM
#129
avatar of JohnSmith

Posts: 1273

Vipper, can you please not turn every thread into a Penals rant? I enjoy reading threads about my favourite faction and my favourite Panzergrens units, but then it feels like you're steamrolling with Penals rant in every thread.



- no access to MG
- no access to AT-gun
- no access to indirect fire
- no access to effective AT


jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:09 PMVipper

Those are problems of the building not Penals


At least explain, don't shut down discussions because you're wrong and blvckdream made a few valid points that challenge your point of view. Honestly, that's probably the densest reply I have ever read in this forum. Especially even worse since you asked the poor fella about it.
30 Dec 2020, 19:18 PM
#130
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1



PTRS is not a weapon upgrade, it's a mediocre sidegrade.

That comment is simply beneath you, you post are usually are much higher quality than that. (I suggest you leave semantic games to another user)

There is nothing wrong with AI DPS of Penals they have good DPS at all ranges.


Saying all these things are just a problem of the tier building and not Penals themselves is true but I can't build Penals in other tier buildings so what is the point? Penals do have these drawbacks and there is no denying that. Only way to solve them is by going for a doctrine with dhsk/m42. It's simply not possible to get 3 Penals + T2 + Zis/Maxim as you will never have enough MP unless it's a complete noob stomp.

The flaw in you logic it that you expect Penals to carry all faction on their shoulders they can not and the should not. Else you would simply have Penal blobs running around the same way you had VG shcreck blobs.

Penal are cost effective unit with no drawbacks, any and all problems with them are related to the design of T1.
30 Dec 2020, 19:20 PM
#131
avatar of Elaindil

Posts: 97


- no access to MG
- no access to AT-gun
- no access to indirect fire
- no access to effective AT


jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:09 PMVipper

Those are problems of the building not Penals



I am sorry but this just too much:clap:

So do we need to work with buildings now?

Why are you purposely acting so dense? Or you really are?



All of these are problems have to do with going Penals. They don't just puff into existence unlike PG that have none of these drawbacks since it was mentioned.
30 Dec 2020, 19:23 PM
#132
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1





I am sorry but this just too much:clap:

So do we need to work with buildings now?

Why are you purposely acting so dense? Or you really are?



All of these are problems have to do with going Penals. They don't just puff into existence unlike PG that have none of these drawbacks since it was mentioned.

Ok ,
so in your opinion Luch has drawback because when you build it you do not get healing in base?
Pak howitzer under-performs because you do not get a HMG with it?

Once more Penal is cost efficient unit.
30 Dec 2020, 19:34 PM
#133
avatar of Elaindil

Posts: 97

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:23 PMVipper

Ok ,
so in your opinion Luch has drawback because when you build it you do not get healing in base?
Pak howitzer under-performs because you do not get a HMG with it?

Once more Penal is cost efficient unit.


Stick to the topic of Penals and PG without whataboutism and deflecting. Do you consider going penals has none of drawbacks mentioned? Just yes or no will suffice if you don't want to elaborate.
30 Dec 2020, 19:38 PM
#134
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1



Stick to the topic of Penals and PG without whataboutism and deflecting. Do you consider going penals has none of drawbacks mentioned? Just yes or no will suffice if you don't want to elaborate.

The topic is actually PGs not Penals.

Going T1 has issues because it badly designed. Penal are fine.

A friendly word of advice if you do not like my answers stop asking for my opinion.
30 Dec 2020, 19:48 PM
#135
avatar of Elaindil

Posts: 97

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:38 PMVipper

The topic is actually PGs not Penals.

Going T1 has issues because it badly designed. Penal are fine.

A friendly word of advice if you do not like my answers stop asking my opinion.


You derailed the topic to penals since post 5 and we all ran with that because Penals are the closest counterpart to PGs.

I've never said I don't like your opinions. I am just confused sometimes by them and curios to get a clarification. Since you are the most active user pushing axis buffs\allies "reworks" it's only natural you get your opinions challenged or discussed.

Like I asked a direct question and you answered very ambiguously
Going T1 has issues because it badly designed. Penal are fine.


I take it going penals does have drawbacks mentioned according to you. Am I correct?
30 Dec 2020, 19:53 PM
#136
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1



You derailed the topic to penals since post 5 and we all ran with that because Penals are the closest counterpart to PGs.

I've never said I don't like your opinions. I am just confused sometimes by them and curios to get a clarification. Since you are the most active user pushing axis buffs\allies "reworks" it's only natural you get your opinions challenged or discussed.

That might be the case if you where not being aggressive. We can debate anything you like but there is little reason to do so in an civilized manner.

Comments like this one "I am sorry but this just too much:clap: " are simply non constructive.


Like I asked a direct question and you answered very ambiguously


I take it going penals does have drawbacks mentioned according to you. Am I correct?

If ones goes T1 there are drawbacks.
30 Dec 2020, 19:56 PM
#137
avatar of Elaindil

Posts: 97


So now that we both confirmed that going Penals actually has drawbacks


- no access to MG
- no access to AT-gun
- no access to indirect fire
- no access to effective AT


Does it mean you changed your mind?

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:01 PMVipper


And no Penal do not have any drawbacks.
(edited)

30 Dec 2020, 19:58 PM
#138
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1


So now that we both confirmed that going Penals actually has drawbacks



Does it mean you changed your mind?



T1 one has drawbacks regardless if you build a single Penal or not.
30 Dec 2020, 19:58 PM
#139
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:23 PMVipper

Ok ,
so in your opinion Luch has drawback because when you build it you do not get healing in base?
Pak howitzer under-performs because you do not get a HMG with it?

You know damn well that these situations are not analagous

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:58 PMVipper

T1 one has drawbacks regardless if you build a single Penal or not.

You know damn well that nobody would ever build t1 under those circumstances
30 Dec 2020, 20:01 PM
#140
avatar of Elaindil

Posts: 97

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 19:58 PMVipper

T1 one has drawbacks regardless if you build a single Penal or not.


When you are saying "T1" do you exclusively mean the building that has been build into existance on the entity of the map in the game of Company of Heroes 2 by the Soviet faction that is on the map?


Do you think we can extrapolate all these drawbacks to all the units in this T1 builidng?
PAGES (16)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

Russian Federation 27
Peru 16
United Kingdom 47
unknown 6
United States 2
United States 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

462 users are online: 462 guests
1 post in the last 24h
39 posts in the last week
146 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44938
Welcome our newest member, unicomposite
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM