Are they not fixing heavies?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

11 Feb 2020, 01:07 AMmrgame2

Ooh is that insider tips?
V1.1 still about delays.

If so, i guess axis is getting screwed again since mod team is insistence on not touching 60td.

No, i'm talking about the bugs that are current in live regarding their AoE performance. They are slightly better than they should.

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 313

11 Feb 2020, 01:55 AMT.R. Stormjäger

Sounds like a well coordinated assault. Perhaps you could learn from it instead of bitching about balance.

Whats to learn? I explained what you do with that doc. It's super brainless.

Posts: 3600 | Subs: 1

11 Feb 2020, 01:55 AMT.R. Stormjäger

Sounds like a well coordinated assault. Perhaps you could learn from it instead of bitching about balance.

Giving to a unit a specific counter to its own counter is dumb, no wonder why it ends on OKW hands since this faction get all the stupidest design units and abilities for the sake of making it fun to play.

Balance comes always after when we talk about OKW.

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13

8 Feb 2020, 20:46 PMLago

The proposed profile seems like a tradeoff relative to the Panzer IV rather than an improvement over it: much less wipey, but perhaps more consistent over several shots.

What's the case against just giving it the Panzer IV's AoE profile?

Because the Tiger still hits you from a further range resulting in less scatter on top of already having a lower scatter value. This means the tank is more likely to hit in general particularly versus clumped units with a high chance of sniping model on direct hits to begin with. The Tiger also has a fast rate of fire on top of a larger AOE in general.

Visit me on Twitch or Youtube!

Playercard of miragefla

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: None
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: None	4v4: None
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: None
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: None

Multi Quote

Posts: 3260

11 Feb 2020, 16:55 PMmiragefla

Because the Tiger still hits you from a further range resulting in less scatter on top of already having a lower scatter value. This means the tank is more likely to hit in general particularly versus clumped units with a high chance of sniping model on direct hits to begin with. The Tiger also has a fast rate of fire on top of a larger AOE in general.

That makes sense.

In that case, assuming I understand it, the new AoE looks like a good solution. It should make a pair of P4s substantially better against infantry than a single Tiger.

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3

Or just remove some utility from kpen offensive. The arty + sight tank commander punishes AT gun play too much when against tiger.

Posts: 884

Personally I like where all the heavies are at now. I think the Tiger I, Pershing, and IS2 are in the best spot. CP13 was way too far out in 1v1 games for these things to be useful. You'd call one in just to kill your opponent's base after you'd already.

Posts: 17 | Subs: 1

Honestly just get rid of heavies. Keep them as fun set pieces for singleplayer, but they don't belong in ranked 1v1 in this state. They are a one unit solution to every problem in the game, REDUCING the tactical depth. Honestly, I'm not coming back to the game until heavies are either SEVERELY nerfed or are out entirely.