Profile of Junaid

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 509

General Information
Register Time: 4 Mar 2014, 04:14 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 May 2017, 19:33 PM


Thread: A question about win rates and the coh2 charts algorithm5 Nov 2015, 12:14 PM Hi all, So, coh2 charts is a big source of data for balance discussions, specifically win rates. I don't understand one thing though: why is the average win rate 66%? I mean, correct me if I am wrong here, but for any number of winners, there has to be an equal number of losers correct? So why are the win rates always 0.50+ at least? And average is 0.66? What exactly is the algorithm they use? (Mods: I put this in the balance section because it seems pertinent, but move it to somewhere else as you deem fit) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Whermacht inf squad size3 Nov 2015, 11:16 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 11:09 AMUnited If you think about it Brits is literally a updated Osteer, in almost every department. I mean I dont mind that, but Osteer didn't deserve to get left behind the brits. anyway the ladder right now is pretty bad. Im a top 200 Brit player, and I cant get games because everyone up there is playing USF. So I play Osteer, and after a few days of games i found out 1: Sturzdorf is unplayable as Osteer 2:You cant beat a top USF player in 1v1 auto 3:Rifle company and heavy calvary are broken Whatever relic developer gavesmoke grenades to riflemen and then added a cheap smoke barrage to a p2p meta commander hates Osteer +1 this is my feeling as well. Brits and ostheer are so alike, and are meant to be alike (see relic faction comparison), except that brits have better units in nearly all ways. Heavy cav, I think, is ok. Its just flame rifle blobberino i dislike In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry versus American Infantry(Rifles)3 Nov 2015, 11:13 AM Too bad it doesn't have the dps compare tool that coh2 stats had In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Plz review,2 Nov 2015, 18:08 PM So I got off to a good start. Not sure where I went wrong tbh. 0 VS Aerlis Junaid For Strategy Section RR by: Junaid map: Crossing in the Woods 3 - In: Replay Reviews
Thread: For Strategy Section RR2 Nov 2015, 18:06 PM I am not sure where I went wrong here. The other guy seemed to have reams of good luck with the stuart. I just didn't know where to focus my defense. In: Replays
Thread: OKW Infantry versus American Infantry(Rifles)2 Nov 2015, 15:53 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2015, 17:31 PMDullahan I'm not saying you're advocating for normalized OKW income, I'm saying that multiplying OKW fuel costs by 1.3 is really silly. OKW get less income but have stronger map presence and can temporarily double their fuel income with resource conversion. A little bit of micromanagement with resource conversion and OKW actually have a resource advantage over other factions. I'm multiplying them to show how much fuel other factions have in comparison. To enable a better comparison with other factions. Fuel is time. For example: Its meaningless to compare okw pziv to ost p4 (for example) by saying ost piv is inferior. You have to factor in that OKW will save that 135 fuel in the same time ost will save 202 fuel. So in that sense, the balance is clearer. By that same logic, luchs is horribly placed because it actually costs 10 more fuel to rush a jpiv. btw i didnt straight out multiply. I did deduct the 40 starting fuel arithmetically. Heres the math: JPIV: Tech cost: 0 (starting 40 fuel) + Unit cost: 1351.5 = 202.5 fuel. Luchs: Tech cost : 801.5 (starting tier free, only T4 cost) + 50*1.5 = 195 fuel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry versus American Infantry(Rifles)1 Nov 2015, 16:27 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2015, 15:52 PMDullahan Adjusting the fuel is very, very silly. Rate of fuel income is affected by territory you control. OKW get less income because they can divert resources from muni to fuel. Not sure on the exact percentage that gets converted but I'd wager it's significant. So in other words, if you want a fast luchs you can absolutely have it very quickly. The only real limiting factor is waiting for the sws halftrack to spawn. The reason the luchs is in the panzer command is to make rushing oanzer command a viable mid game build. If you get BHQ--> PC you need a light vehicle. Even building mech at the start of the game then panzer asap after can mean a really fast luchs + pziv. You just have to micromanage resource conversion so you have enough muni for sturmpio medkits. If Relic ever listens to you guys and swaps okw units around they'll be a much lamer faction for it. No one else has the teching variety OKW has. Experiment sometime and you'll see how neato they are. I never advocated a fuel rate adjustment. You misunderstood the intent of my post. I was just saying that an OKW player can get a luchs out at the same time as he can rush a JPIV. The Luchs is horribly placed in the tech structure. It'd be like moving t-70 to soviet T4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Croc not nerfed properly?1 Nov 2015, 14:15 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2015, 11:51 AM__deleted__ Also many people forget that flame vehicles like croco or kv8 were double nerfed. First nerf - damage from 16 to 10 DMG (62 = of pre nerfed damage) second nerf - inceandiary weapons , tanks and handheld grenades flame dot damage icrease for 0,5 second to 1,25 second - this mean now they deal 10 dmg every 1,25 second not 16dmg every half second whitch translates into ONLY 25% damage of prenerf state Hector, wasn't flame DoT dmg unrelated to the weapon dmg? IIRC it was 6 or 8 dmg per tick or something. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Current state of ostheer.1 Nov 2015, 12:45 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 20:48 PMturbotortoise Give the Wehrmacht one single shock unit at any stage of the game, please. +1. I vote for PZiii In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry versus American Infantry(Rifles)1 Nov 2015, 12:44 PM The Luchs is in a horrible place tech wise. They ought to move it to Battlegroup HQ or Mechanized HQ. It costs 195 fu (adjusted) to rush out a Luchs. For comparison: JPIV costs 202 fu (adjusted) In: COH2 Balance