Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Engineer-less teching for soviets and Ost?7 Dec 2015, 14:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 14:23 PMkitekaze The engineer and pioneer are required to construct building to tech, but in return, they can be upgraded with flamer. Other faction cannot unless specific commander is selected. I would argue if upgrading to flamer counterweights dual LMGs or nades or faster repair rates or actual combat potential and combat scaling on top of repair scaling. CEs and Pios got nothing on RETs, spios and REs who can be actual combat troops with actual combat scaling. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Engineer-less teching for soviets and Ost?7 Dec 2015, 14:03 PM I don't mind returning them to base, what I mind is that if I want to save up and tech all at once, I'm down a squad for the next 4 minutes. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Durability of Conscripts7 Dec 2015, 14:02 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 13:48 PM__deleted__ Only think they lack is firepower. This make them die a lot in the early game before they vet up and basic low dps together with all the rec acc vet of other units makes them irrelevant in late game as, while durable themselves, they cause literally no attrition. They also have less effective hp then 6 models, because of 1< base rec acc, which means you are still forced for the doctrines with weapon upgrades or elite inf to even compete. I think they can have psh now at 1 CP , all other weapons are at 1 CP (even allmighty g43) And once rusian layer build all tiers he should get passive 1 Dp28 lmg on all coscripts. This would help lot of doctrines and also will give russina player a think why he should tech all tiers. After OKW changed I think it is not big buff at all . Makes sense now that all infantry except cons and penals actually scale and do damage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Vehicle path finding Improvement7 Dec 2015, 13:42 PM Feels better overall, especially for tanks, but I had funny kubel pathing moments too. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: KT is too strong for the current OKW state7 Dec 2015, 12:21 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 09:45 AMZyllen ignoring the stun on hit mechanic are you. Yes, because intended use of JT vs armor is not to use it at 85 range, but drive up all the way into the range of tanks and ATGs, preferably with rear armor to the opponent. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KT is too strong for the current OKW state7 Dec 2015, 09:10 AM It just occurred to me that its call-in now, because they couldn't figure out how to make it stock and limited to 1, so they went easy way by removing the 90 sec build time it had And speaking about tigers, when Jagd will have its old price back? Makes kind of no sense for it to cost as much as ele while being superior at everything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Ambulance Weapon Drops7 Dec 2015, 08:39 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2015, 21:57 PMSwift Ambulances carrying guns instead of medicine. What is this, Special forces spy ambulances? Your argument of giving up field presence so you can upgrade is feasible, however, you can dual upgrade and to compensate for the American early aggressive power you are forced to give up some map control. Big deal, you can give the weapons to every unit. Also, if you're having to retreat idle squads to upgrade, you're doing well already, so often when you upgrade is when you have retreated after losing health/models. Slap "Crimea aid" on them and it will work In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Time for Statistics7 Dec 2015, 08:34 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2015, 23:10 PMCafo Remember when mortar half tracks were common to counter brit emplacements, who uses that shit anymore, nobody. It might have something to do with nobody using emplacements any longer and players actually realizing after wiping all the tears that emplacements aren't that hard to counter In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Jagdpanzer IV7 Dec 2015, 08:07 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 01:10 AMBagBoss Is there any reason to build one with this new patch? The panther is in the same tier and fulfills both a AT and AI roles. Pre patch, the Jagdpanzer served as a "safe" option if you did not have the fuel to tech past tier 1 and afford a PIV or Panther. Its revamped OKW so... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should the Stuart have a dedicated role?6 Dec 2015, 22:36 PM Stuart HAVE diedicated role. Its light infantry support. In: Lobby