Why was volks with schreck op? And riflemen/ reach echolon with double bazookers not?
Because volks in comparison are:
-Cheap to get
-Cheap to sustain
-Easy to replace
-not sacrificing as much DPS and resources
And bazookas in comparison is:
-Dealing lower damage
-not alpha striking
-having lower penetration
-shooting at targets that actually do use armor
Why was schreck remove from volks? Why wasn´t the schreck get a little nerf?
Because it would need to go down to bazooka level in terms of damage and penetration or to old PTRS vs infantry in terms of accuracy, neither being good or giving the proper feel solution.
Wouldn´t this the better soultion?
Now okw have only schreck which is very weak and cant do his only job: destroy tanks cause it gets wipe by single hits from most tanks and is easily killable by infantery.
Its as strong as it was.
You just can't have a blob running with 6 of them around without any downside.
the us, brits and russian version from anti tank gun are much more better vs tanks and life much longer.
Brits don't have AT snare or reliable handheld AT.
Soviets pay extra for AT snare and require a squad that no one in his right mind uses for how weak it is and don't have stock handheld AT.
Isn't it obvious that a faction with ALL the possible options shouldn't excel in them all in comparison to factions that suffer limitations to viability and usability of their AT?(rethorical question-sure it wasn't obvious, otherwise we wouldn't have the question)
u need 3 raketen for the some job as a m1 gun.
And 3 cons to do the same as 1 volk
and puma is a good vs tanks..but a joke vs infanterie....the amored car from brits is much better.
Puma is AT light with AI capabilities(its pintle is as strong as ost LMG42 on grens).
AC is much more expensive to get(side tech vs regular), got 20% lower gun range and its main gun is hardly amazing vs infantry, its MG do most of the hard work, its also more of a generalist unit in comparison to AT specialist puma.
Plus, if you go for AI, there is excelling luchs.