Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient26 Feb 2018, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2018, 08:49 AMzarok47 Only person i ever saw spamming panthers in 2's was you I use them for AI (no, seriously, 20-30+ ai kills is norm on them) Plus, that is my exact point, why get JP4 when panther was vastly superior and barely more expensive back then? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient26 Feb 2018, 05:51 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 22:57 PMthedarkarmadillo Thats because the okw and ost p4 are not the same. One spawns with 234 armour the other only 180. The panthers used to be the same price iirc (command panther too for reasons unknown) Okw vehicles are super durable, that warrants and extra cost. The only issue is that allied infantry stomps so much that allied medium armour isnt as necessary as axis mediums meaning the allies can sink their fuel into TDs allowing them to counter the armour advantage the axis need to tip the infantry fights. They used to be exactly the same, bar the vet bonuses. Armor skirts used to be a muni upgrade. It started to change with revamps. Snippy snowflake there knows perfectly well what I'm saying, but likes numbers more then actual gameplay to the point of focusing on numbers alone without any context. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Request for Relic: No Matching with Blocked players26 Feb 2018, 05:48 AM Then you'd have ability to influence who you are matched with in matchmaking, which is the opposite point of matchmaking. Get a reliable team or accept that random team games are full of noobs who remind themselves 2 mins into the game that they do not have time to play or expect to be carried or whatever. In: Lobby
Thread: Penals are currently unbalanced25 Feb 2018, 19:45 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 19:04 PMCaptain QQ I guess my misunderstanding was only reinforced because when partisans picked up a crew weapon they kept their ppsh... (and for a brief period in time their cloak as well). I also seem to remember being told that shock troops picking up crew weapons meant the crew would have ppsh and armor, but not any of the reinforcements. two different emchanics though I get it. recrew vs merge. Because if you crew team weapon with a squad, then you create second identical squad, just with a team weapon. Its perfectly possible to have HMG42 with STG44 crew, HF flanking it then. And reinforcements will be from that same squad, so they will have both, armor/rec acc and weapon of squad that picked it up. Only special weapons do not transfer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals are currently unbalanced25 Feb 2018, 18:59 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 18:48 PMCaptain QQ WHAT!?!? This is counter to everything I learned in the past few years. Was this changed at some point? I mean this was why you never merged cons into shocks. Or is that because while they get the ppsh they dont get the armor? 1) It works like that since pre release alpha. 2) You didn't merged cons with shocks, because you would be losing 100 to 50% of durability, depending on the period they had 2 or 1,5 armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Jacksons25 Feb 2018, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 08:29 AMFiresparks buffing the jackson's hp was the lazy option but it works. would have prefer to make the jackson more of a puma on steroid. Quite sure its called M10 Wolverine, but since Jackson was made into beefed up M10 already instead of having its own flavor pre changes and M10 being tied to tech, removing the only singular reason you'd ever want one, well... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient25 Feb 2018, 09:18 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 09:11 AMVipper Unfortanlly the only lessons you can teach me are on subject that you are good at and those are being a "fanboy" and insulting others and I am not interested in learning either. To be hones, I believe you are on your way there alone without me guiding anything. All I see you ever do is post allies nerfs and act like a snippy smartass, so you have well covered both, being a fanboy and insulting(as subtle as you may think you are). 150-135 = 15 not 25 310-260 = 60 not 25 280-245 = 35 not 25 Pls stop posting as if you are spokesman for Relic especially since what you write is simply wrong. Please do what you do best and go read stuff up. Initially OKW armor had same cost as ost, but that was changed when their eco was changed, the changes did not happen patch to patch, but over time and they add up to +25 fuel for respective vehicles. But I appreciate the effort on your part for trying to be as snippy as I used to be back in the day. You're on the very right track, but still lack the experience. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient25 Feb 2018, 08:47 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2018, 02:29 AMSmiling Tiger Are you not seeing the obvious problem with your theory? If all OKW armored vehicles are supposed to be affected by this, then how come the Jagdpanzer4 (the unit that most people agree is overpriced and that we were talking about) isnt even on this list? Also these patch notes arnt up to date. The current King Tiger costs 280 fuel, the Panzer 4 costs 140 fuel and the Panther costs 185 fuel. Because 1) It was expensive already. 2) Was never spammed heavily because MUH PUNTOR In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections24 Feb 2018, 23:31 PM I've never seen him do that, but then again, I'm not watching him all the time and he doesn't always go meta/optimal stuff. Most of the time its pretty bad idea, even if the values look good on paper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections24 Feb 2018, 23:27 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 23:14 PMJae For Jett Vet 0 double bren commandos have almost equal max range dps to vet 0 lmg34 obers. Max vet double bren commandos have around 90% of the max range dps of max vet lmg34 obers. Commandos brens are a little more than 50% better than infantry section brens (while getting their cover bonuses). Commando brens (and all lmgs that commandos pick up, I believe) can be fired on the move too. Again, I know the values, but that's beside the point. The point is an argument with unrealistic setup was used. Do you know anyone playing multiplayer who regularly uses BRENs on commandos, isn't 4v4 player and have at the very worst rank 300? Literally no one does that, because its not efficient muni use and it doesn't suit commandos role. In: COH2 Balance