Profile of Katitof

The problem with comparing it to the IS 2 and saying its fine is that the IS 2 is also in a pretty bad spot right now. They both have the same problem, their scatter sucks, so they can hardly hit infantry, the difference is that the KT has to fight larger and better squads with better supporting TDs.

That's why KT has more hp and higher damage.
It itself also is supposed to have a backup of infantry.

And I completely fail to see how a tank having to fight tank destroyers which hardcounter it should be any issue here. If you are using all or nothing card, you need to be ready to lose it when opponent is prepared with correct counter, especially now that allied TDs are actually able to put a dent in its armor.

You've ignored a very critical and meaningful fact that when included, suddenly makes your point void.

You expected flowers and a box of chocolates?
You do the exact very same thing you accuse others of constantly.

So now let me throw that last piece here:

Combined DPS of churchill MGs is 13,27 at long range and 26,87 at close range.
Only coax and singular other MG can focus any one squad resulting in very best case with 6,77 to 14,45 dps.

Combined DPS of P4/Panther(with ALL the MGs it got, not only the ones convenient for argument) is 15,66 at far and 31,57 dps at close and ALL THREE can focus any given squad at the time.

The numbers will change depending on formulas you want to use, but they are not going to change the relation.

Churchill has a main gun ,4 mg (vet 1) and Grenades. It can kill infantry better than other tanks.

Your argument made it sound like churchills MGs made it some kind of powerhouse in comparison to other tanks, when in fact, because of how these MGs work, its WORSE at killing infantry then other tanks.
Nade is irrelevant, unless you allowed churchill to get behind your ATG.

I'm pointing out you're wrong and are trying again to force semantic argument down our throats, ESPECIALLY with you ignoring the pintle MG, which only shows how much bias you're going to show only to make your argument sound more "solid".

Its pretty much slow non doctrinal IS-2 with more HP, more range and 50% higher damage.
Its fine as it is.

Dir Katitof once more you are presenting your own opinion as if it was Relic's.

What Relic actually wrote is that when they where balancing heavy tanks they actually made them 30%-40% more powerful due to "opportunity cost".

PLS either start quoting Relic when you want to use them as an argument or stop mentioning them at all.

Watch fucking relic twitch vods and stop acting like sassy, know-it-all ignorant.

As much as you want and see yourself as the all knowing voice of reason - you are not.
High attitude and nipping does not make you forum noble.

I am fed up with it, people are fed up with it and mods are fed up with it as you could read on your latest PW if you need a proof even for that.

It seems as if handheld AT is enough for allied armies. Guards, penals, rifles and british IS all have the capability to take out most armour on their own. It's for some reason only ok to hamstring handheld AT in the axis factions.

Show me a single 1v1 where you can rely on PTRS or PIATs only for AT.
I can see zooks being able to and most certainly not against big cats.