Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Jackson nerf22 Apr 2018, 17:27 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 17:23 PMFiresparks The jackson should have had its evasion increase to reinforce the fact it's a skirmisher, not a slugger. Fun fact: Slugger is its historical nickname In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Petition to bring back female partisans in the next patch22 Apr 2018, 17:08 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 17:02 PMPhoenix101 And what about women of colour!? Ofc a game forum full of alt-right wehraboo white boy basement dwellers would only want to send white women to die under fascist guns but if you lot can check your privilege, maybe you'll be able to enjoy the full rainbow diversity of REALITY! #MOREOFUSTHANYOU In: Lobby
Thread: Jackson nerf22 Apr 2018, 16:01 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 15:57 PMVipper And that does not make the FF/SU-85 specialized. In order for this units to be specialized vs super heavies they would need high penetration low accuracy (they already have high penetration). No, existence of these alternatives does not make FF and SU specialized. Their much higher penetration and lower rate of fire, designed to combat slower or highly armored vehicles is. Accuracy does not play as big of a role, because target size affects all incoming shots, that includes ATGs, which need to combat both, med and heavy armor without 100% accuracy on both and same goes for handheld AT. And making units which are end of tier and capable of fighting reliably exclusively 3 axis units(taking into account your accuracy thing, which would make them unreliable against meds), which can engage a wide range of targets is utterly retarded idea to even think of. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson nerf22 Apr 2018, 15:18 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 15:12 PMVipper There is nothing specialized about FF/SU-85 as tds, their high a accuracy make them very good vs all vehicles There still are 2 lighter, cheaper options that are capable of engaging med armor, especially in soviet case. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hull down in Spring Ballance Patch22 Apr 2018, 15:12 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 15:00 PMGrumpy Ost has cloak for tanks? Hull down allows vehicles to move? Giving it cloak would help make up for lack of 60 range TD, without changing range of Ost tanks/TD's. Not ost, but giving one faction other factions abilities+more is not exactly a good way to balance stuff. Example: For mother russia vs OKW valliant assault or whatever its called(the one in falls doctrine). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 22222 Apr 2018, 08:54 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 08:39 AMzarok47 200 is reasonable since Ostheer is manpower strained and you need 2 222's to fight other LV's. The limiting factor is fuel, 60 fuel isn't cheap and 90 fuel is of the charts for what you get. The actual controversy here is cost reduction and 50% armor buff. One or the other, lets not get back to relic style overbuffing and overnerfing, usually leaving unit in the latter state. Was it up to me, I'd left the cost where it is, gave it 2 additional armor and buffed MG34 as despite 34 scaling really well, its base dps is similar to that of AEC or puma coax. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 22222 Apr 2018, 08:23 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 01:51 AMDiogenes5 Didn't it use to be 180? 250 is absolutely ridiculous. Years ago, when it had 200 hp and much weaker weapons. 250 is perfectly reasonable for what you get, compared to M20, which costs 320 and can't engage literally all targets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hull down in Spring Ballance Patch22 Apr 2018, 08:21 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 05:45 AMGrumpy Make it cloak also - detectable at range 20-25. It could still be hit by a TD, but you would have to spot and the spotting unit would take fire. You're walking on other abilities field. There already is vehicle cloak and its not nor should it be on axis high profile armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I strongly oppose the Soviet sniper change22 Apr 2018, 08:20 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 07:30 AMthedarkarmadillo Make spam unachievable. Make the sniper 82hp, spotter less, and make it 400 or more MP. Getting 2 snipers and a single support infantry is then minimum 1040mp. Thats 4 mainline squads and a lil smidge extra reinforcements. Flanking will still be rewarded because the spotter is squishier (plus buffed counters) sniper is still unique. Idk why they keep trying to fit units into special cookie cutter moulds when its clearly different when its clearly not designed to fit. Embrace its design and make the price fit the unit instead of making the unit fit the price That would not make spam unachievable. That would make getting a sniper at all a retarded idea. Recon team often escaped on 1 model and that 1 40hp model bleeds 90 mp each time. While the sniper was still present, it also suffered heavy attrition if you went for it. However the problem is existence of snipers in CoH all together. I never understood why they went with super expensive very high risk and reward unit for early game instead of specialized squad or light vehicle. PE ATHT anyone? Now THAT was a sniper done right, potent, very counterable, fun to play with and unique. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Sega Ownership - shareholders21 Apr 2018, 07:36 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Apr 2018, 07:26 AMValeran Is this Sega restructuring? Oh, this is means that sega now will be optimize their budget and the first decision that they will do it's kill lelic, as the most unprofitable studio at sega. You confused sega with EA. In: Lobby