Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 14:10 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 14:03 PMullumulu I cant see where the buff is when guards could only get 2 ptrs OR 2 dps instead 2 ptrs AND 2 dps? If you don't see that guards would have to go down in cost or ptrs up in potency and DPs up in potency, then you don't know how balance works or what it even is. It would also make guards much more mobile and significantly decrease chance of weapon drops. It is also a dead horse we have talked about in year 1, when people still remembered how campaign Guards worked and these campaign guards would be your new guards as otherwise they would be severely underpowered. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2020 CoH 3 is becoming more real by every day13 Nov 2018, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 05:40 AMCrecer13 Tobis said absolutely correct: It's company of heroes, not company of war criminals. They didn't show anything like that in the first game even with a German campaign. CoH2 is full of massacring civilians and other junk for no reason. I advise you to go play first mission, but this time pay attention to ALL dialogue. Replay it as many times as it takes to understand you're wrong. In: Lobby
Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 09:37 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 02:23 AMTheGentlemenTroll The issue with anti-everything units is that they are too proficient at being anti-everything. Jack of all trades units shouldn’t be able to beat handily beat specialist units. For example Guards shouldnt handily beat comparable axis AI specialist infantry when Guards are more versatile overall. Well, if you look at guards weapons, you'll notice that they most certainly are AI specialist with limited AT capability(they will chase off light, but medium will stomp them). They do not have anything AT specialists have, no burst AT weapon, no AT snare and most certainly, no reliable AT weapon. They are also fitting the soviet theme of units doing multiple roles at once, like ZiS and SU-76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AC 2v2 statistics (Wildcard, QT1, QT2, Finals)13 Nov 2018, 09:33 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 04:28 AMOutsider_Sidaroth OMG! The USF pick and win ratio is just sad. Well, USF bring nothing to early game that soviets can't bring and have inferior late game AND can't counter sniper at all. Not much point to bring them to MP. In: Lobby
Thread: 2020 CoH 3 is becoming more real by every day12 Nov 2018, 21:37 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2018, 17:11 PMCrecer13 I am Russian and I would like Relic to do work on her mistakes and make a normal story about the Eastern Front and not a collection of stories in the style of "The Enemy at the Gates". I will not buy for the third time the same factions that were already in the first part of the game. And what is the problem with that? CoH story was always cliche and stereotypes-every single story mission, including ToW. All USF campaigns is saving private rayan all over again or fury. But its supposed to be like that. If you want super accurate historical WW2 game, you'd have marching columns, trains going back and there and watching supplies diminish 80% of the time. Problems start only if people who do not even buy games get collective butthurt based on manipulated content preview. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch11 Nov 2018, 22:48 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2018, 21:26 PMVipper This information is simply inaccurate, actually CE's Mosins have better synergy with flamers than Pioneer's Mp-40 And tell me again, how does that matter in context of vetting up with mine sweeper equipped, which was the post about? Is it safe to assume you are aware that you can not equip both sweeper and flamer at once? In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch11 Nov 2018, 21:11 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2018, 16:31 PMThamor Any possibility to add for Ostheer&Soviet engineers the possibility to put mine sweeper off so they can still have 4 models using weapons. This change wouldn't be anything too upsetting for anyone as both engineers with minesweepers are pretty much useless for dps and giving the possibility of putting the minesweeper to toggle option would help that little bit. I'd rather they still had a way to vet with a sweeper instead. While to a point, it is possible for pios due to how SMGs work, sweeper CEs are vet pinatas unable to score any themselves. Why CE weapon profile wasn't changed together with cons when they had theirs altered is beyond me, both units suffered exactly the same set of problems due to their inaccurate weapon and something tells me CE spam won't become meta if CEs become more reliable with their rifles. In: Lobby
Thread: received damage modifiers for tanks11 Nov 2018, 10:04 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2018, 01:40 AMVipper Soviet industry has access to both KV-2 and KV-8 and both units have damage reduction. In addition it has access to "Vehicle Crew Repair Training" and "Repair stations" (that have not received a nerf in their repair speed as engineer have). That allows these unit to return to the field allot faster than other units. In the end of the day if there not "really much difference", there little reason for damage reduction especially for units with such high armor values both frontal and rear, as the KV-2 has instead of HP. The units are in more doctrines then soviet industry. That's like whining and demanding nerf to tiger, because in one doctrine it can use smoke. Repair stations received a massive nerf in huge cost increase in the past. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch10 Nov 2018, 21:43 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2018, 20:05 PMVipper That might be a side affect but there is little reason to justifying KV-2 having damage reduction, other super heavies do not have it. On the other hand, other super heavies have between 375 and 500 armor and more health. They also have penetration fitting super heavy and not lower one then some premium mediums. I don't really want to go into KV-1 because it will derail the thread, but the combination of damage reduction and fast repair as available to KV-2 KV-8 and Dozer should be avoided. If these unit durability HP is enough. If you want to debate issue further I suggested to do so in the linked thread. What fast repairs are in terror doctrine? Or Urban defense doctrine? In: Lobby
Thread: 120mm Mortars Are too relaint on RNG10 Nov 2018, 11:14 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2018, 10:58 AMullumulu The thing is: every allie faction has acces to mortar units which outrange the axis mortar units easily. The advantage goes too allies Soviet mortar = clone of ost mortar = clone of USF mortar. If you want to talk doctrines, then you have mortar halftruck for poor ost, which will counter 100% all allied mortars with literally a single click while being literally impossible to counter barrage. And the one stock mortar happens to not be able to move, so its perfectly justified why its got more range. In: COH2 Balance