Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Motherland HMGs rework4 Mar 2019, 08:58 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 03:13 AMdistrofio DshK has no deathloop. Swap them. Make maxim doctrinal and worth the price Dshk has the exact same loop as maxim. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?3 Mar 2019, 15:12 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2019, 14:50 PMdk828315 I wasn't asking for direct nerfs, just change it into a barrage weapon so it doesn't perform like the old leig anymore. Its end of tech 70 fuel mortar on tracks. It needs to perform for that cost and timing. It being effective when spammed is irrelevant, everything is effective when spammed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why has the USF regular sherman become so bad...2 Mar 2019, 11:41 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2019, 09:31 AMVipper Sherman does not have "poor" penetration it is inline with the other medium tanks. You forgot to not ignore the fact that axis tanks armor is definitely not in line with all the 160 armor mediums again. Not saying sherman isn't fine, it is, but stop acting like penetration can be compared without taking into account armor of opponent. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer MG/Early1 Mar 2019, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 18:42 PMdistrofio How would you make up for the HMG cost increase? (if you were to) With regards of not punish OST early game i mean. A single gren buff would be a bad idea, it will unbalance them into blobs or overperform for their cost. If the gren cost went down, would that be bad? I wouldn't, because performance wise, every single ost unit(arguably except ostwind unless its spammed) does perform very well for its timing and cost with that one single T0 exception. We also literally talk about less then 4 seconds of mp income in early game, meanwhile bonus mp saves you 16 seconds you'd have to wait for otherwise. Unless you want to spam them, you won't even notice and it won't be puts on volks hat punching above its weight anymore takes off volks hat. Again, training wheels can come off now and no, ice cone in return is not needed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Discuss for the votes1 Mar 2019, 13:31 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 13:30 PMVipper and specific measures have been taken for units that where too strong when picking those weapons. Thank you for tl;dr'ing my whole point. In: Lobby
Thread: Discuss for the votes1 Mar 2019, 13:22 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 12:51 PMWiderstreit Dropping reccources is fine, but tranfer vehilces and weapons is broken if you don't balance it. How? A player paid full price for it and that player doesn't get to use it. So how is that broken? There is no free stuff involved, everything is paid for the intended amount and player who makes donation is that much more weaker as now he is short 1 unit/weapon upgrade on his army. Its not like one player can focus on drones to get minerals and just feed other one resources so he just spams stuff and fights. In: Lobby
Thread: Discuss for the votes1 Mar 2019, 12:35 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 12:28 PMWiderstreit Soviets are designed NOT to have such upgrades. That is why penals are so strong, because they have to compensate the lack. To overcome this design is not a different play-stile, it is simply a bad design, I would also say bug-using. As stupid as US vehicle-Crews, te decrew should be removed by an auto-repair function too. UKF can donate weapons to team mates(and crew weapons). USF can donate vehicles to team mates(and crew weapons). Soviets can donate fuel to team mates. Ost can donate resources to team mates. OKW is all about leeching, so irrelevant here. Point is, in team games completely different dynamics and rules apply. You can't remove between faction synergies, because these synergies are what makes for team games. Each USF donated vehicle is 1 less vehicle for USF. Each weapon donated by UKF is 1 weapon less for UKF. Soviets and ost also do not exactly float resources they use for their supply drops and impact of raw resource boost can be greater. Also, weapons dropping is a thing, you will now want to remove weapon slots form certain units because they might be strong? Will you nerf HMG42 performance, because once captures by soviets it'll have 6 men crew? The REAL issue was cons with dual LMGs and that was already addressed ages ago, so instead of bitching about penals with LMGs, how about you'll show us examples from competitive level 2v2 where its used to the overpowering extend instead of whining how theoretically strong it is? In: Lobby
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 11:34 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 11:02 AMullumulu You are the guy which bring the the "op" in this discussion, not me. I only said that is funny that AT satchels ok on allie side..but you need only thinking about to give them on stpios ...allie fanbois come a sec later cry it is not needed. Yes, AT satchels on allied side is ok. If one side has weaker infantry AT, it gets better supplemental abilities. That's how balance works. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 10:56 AM So... satchel does exactly what it was meant to do and its op now? Pull your head out of your rear please. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Discuss for the votes1 Mar 2019, 10:18 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 09:54 AMSander93 Nowadays Pfussies only get the +40% accuracy that almost every Axis squad gets. In fact, Pfussies are the living proof that both huge accuracy vet and weapon upgrades should not exist at the same time since their additional +20% accuracy was changed to faster capping speed a long time ago. True that, holly balls having to check multiple threads for all the live patch notes, because apparently compiling it all into 1 thread is 2 hrd. In: Lobby