Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 15:51 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 15:42 PMBurts The thing is, i feel that all vet abilities need a rework. Not all, but certainly infantry and tanks(not TDs) of the ones of vanila armies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 15:03 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 14:48 PMausterlitz Actually i think our vet 1 medical supplies ability might be something u guys may be interested in. Where do I sign to to trade triplol mines for that? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 14:29 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 13:09 PMofield Given the fact the Tiger is slower than the IS2 and has 20% less armor resulting in a overall lower survivability, i would say yes. That is true only if your Tiger fights axis AT. But it fights allies AT, which shoots slower or have lower damage or lower penetration, most often a combination of 2 or all 3, then no, Tiger doesn't have lower survivability, in fact its pretty similar against anything and everything except other medium tanks, where indeed, IS-2 is more survivable. Against infantry AT, AT guns and AT tanks Tiger got more survivability which means overall durability on the contrast of AT it faces is more or less equal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 11:54 AMJohnnyB Well why don't you look from the oposite way? This is the only chance a PIV may have to destroy a su-85. But oh, we were talking about Tigers here. So explain me how a slow turtle with a verry small speed boost can hope to efficiently flank or reach a Su-85? If you keep backing up, Tiger won't reach your su-85 not even with the mother of blitzkrieg, before it will take cover after the zis wall. Why won't you look at it from your own POV? See what T34s and shermans do to kill JP4 and do the same. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 11:50 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 11:15 AMCannonade Its you with double standards. At the same time as your say that Tiger should for some magical reason have NO Vet ability, you also want to buff IS-2 and KV1 even harder in the same department. That is the very definition of a dishonest double standard. So sorry, no. I see right through you. Oh, but please, feel free to quote me where I've said IS-2 and KV-1 should be buffed. All I was saying is that axis heavies have unfair advantage of additional combat effective vet level, which means axcis heavies have 3-5 levels of vet while sov heavies have just 2. Please, show me where is the double standard here, because pinpointing yours(axis armor should have all levels of vet useful, soviet tanks are fine with just 2) is piss easy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Incoming received accuracy for OKW units19 Aug 2014, 11:15 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 17:35 PMwooof the point here is, besides obersoldaten, this requires vet infantry to be buffed by an officer. soviets can do the same thing with fhqs. non vet shocks, guards (98.5% accuracy without vet), maxim, dshk, and vet penals can all exceed 100%. then in team games you have vet rifles, m2hb, non vet pathfinders, non vet paratroopers etc. FHQ gives accuracy modifier? Wasn't it damage modifier? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 11:03 AMCannonade So now you are proposing not only removing ALL abilities from Tiger, you also simultaneously want to buff IS2 and KV1 at the same time. This is getting really ridiculous. I like how you conveniently ignore the fact that sov heavies have practically no vet1 ability and do fine, but suddenly hell breaks loose upon a sole thought of tiger being equal to them in that sense. Please, explain to us all why its mandatory for Tiger to have it while IS-2 and KV-2 have nothing practical? Double standards argument you hold by default aside obviously. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 10:35 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 10:25 AMHitman5 What a bunch of lies. 76s destroy infantry far better than any other regular medium tank. 76 is way better for killing inf with main gun than sherman and definitely better than PzIV too. Ummm, both OKW and wehr P4s have much better AI stats and much better MG firepower including pintles. All shermans have much better AI and pintles. Even T34/85 is better. Since recent P4 change its not even competition, the only thing that goes for T34/76 is cost, everything else P4 performs better. Keep up with stats and changes. T34/76 is at best average against infantry after changes to AoE profiles and buffs to P4. You want great AI medium tank, try P4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 10:06 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 10:03 AMSarantini ] The idea of capturing a point with a KV-2 still makes me laugh Hey! I actually had a game that ended because I capped a point with KV-2! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 10:01 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 09:56 AMbämbabäm Because noone used it So it was actually balanced with soviet tank vet then. In: COH2 Balance