Profile of Kreatiir

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 23:36 PMDullahan

It's fine.

It still does great damage to infantry and light vehicles. Can even do some damage to medium vehicles.


The decision between Cromwell/Centaur is still a very valid one.

Jump back to quoted post4 Nov 2015, 09:01 AMGiaA

If I'm not mistaken they have been nerfed with the last patch ? I think it was anti building modifier from 1.5 to 1.25 or something. They're only good on urban maps. On Langres and crossing they suck. The problem is that flamers on mainline infantry are just a flawed concept because it essentially means that the opponent won't be able to use any building whatsoever.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 22:21 PMkafrion

i think usf flamers are not as potent as you ppl make them look like after all its a doctrinal ability how about finding another ability to match them , like g43s for example . If i remember well that used to be the solution against penal spam at one point when penals where all the rage . Also light artillery units need the autofire if they remove it they might as well remove the whole units

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 13:13 PMQuercus

Abandons:
Maybe not remove this completely but make it much less frequent - and then (as people have said) the abandoned vehicle also has destroyed main gun and destroyed engine so can't be used again until completely repaired.