Profile of dasheepeh

Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 22:13 PMAlexzandvar

It's not more or less likely to wipe squads than the PIV, and it costs 25 fuel less. As has been said before in the thread the T34's biggest issue is the fact the MG's on it aren't that great, and the lack of a proper reload time equivalent to other medium tanks.

Massed T34's are good against infantry due to the shear amount of firepower your putting out, but the issue is that anything in enough numbers is good. If the T34 had a proper reload speed and better MG's it would be a good all round tank, but it would need a increase in fuel cost.

Right now massed KV1's are far, far better. Good armor, better reload speed, more health, and only less armor. Not to mention you don't need to pay teching costs, which IMO is the biggest issue facing T3 viability, not the issues with the T34 itself.

EDIT: And why do you keep avoiding the fact that you don't seem to have knowledge of the current meta, like, at all?

Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2015, 09:56 AMAlexzandvar

Except it does? The T34 and PIV's anti infantry are almost exactly the same except for the MG's, which should both be the same, why they aren't already is a mystery only Relic knows the answer.

The T34 doesn't have accuracy issues on it's main gun, it has issues with the fact they accidentally gave it a huge reload.

Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2015, 04:22 AMAlexzandvar

Why do people keep saying this when it's been proven wrong 3 times in the thread.