Profile of elchino7

I couldn't read past the first change of buffing the shit out of Wehr w 5-man gren squads and nerfing the fuck out of Sovs with molotov/ATnade either or.

The lack of global upgrades is a big issue, but using that specific suggestion as your first example just buries the legitimacy of your entire post imo. Perhaps you should start with something a little more popular, like tank smoke or tank traps, which are basic gameplay features of Company of Heroes that have been relegated to bad commander DLC.

+1

The thread, somehow, would be fine if only it wasnt a big nerf soviet - buff german. The bold text is fine, as things that can be improved. What is really wrong is mostly what you write later or how you try to explain it. Erase or try to be less bias and just leave the bold text.

Global Upgrades
Squad wipes
Auto locking and auto engine damage faust and at nade
Vehicle targeting/ AT gun targeting
Depth to vehicle combat
How tank fire effects at guns
Flame weapons
Capping
Resources
DLC
Veterancy
Terrain destruction
Control/Pathing

All of this is great, but consider the consquences on balance if anything is tweaked. Theorcrafting and gameplay are too far away from each other.

I think we need a bigger sign and a big honk everytime germans build s-mine

Radio intercept??

People are just not used to have to get a minesweeper as soviet or use other available options.

Be glad, german using muni on mines means 1 less bunker upgrade, LMG42, G43, FHT, upgun, etc.

some of these things are in the works, thanks for the feedback everyone

I hope its not the Molotovs are OP

1-Damage/crit system: damage should be steady enough that players should know who is going to win what batter based on cover, range not due to random luck

2-Molatovs:...

There is a silly mechanic where suppressed cons throw these and retreat doing more damage and making a mg team reteat even though the cons over extended and "lost" the fight - why reward bad play?

3- COns...

4- Tank combat – this mean to me different penetrations at different ranges, different armour on side and back and chances for turret, engine damage via combat ( like vcoh) the more layers of detail the better

1- That only applies to vehicles. (Something like 80% dead crit, 10% engine damage, 10% abandoned). Numbers may difer.

A) Flame weapons rely on crits, this could be tone down. Something like increasing DOT but reducing the crit %.

2- Move your MG. Everytime you are molied you dont need to retreat. Just back up.

B) Only thing i would notice is that mg crew should move a bit faster to recrew the mg. A dead crit on the mg gunner derivates into awful situations (any unit getting allmighty RNG accuracy killing the gunner and being able to rush from the front its annoying). A dead crit on the gunner while being on fired is a dead mg.

3- I would love to see how people would react if Faust and Rifle nades werent unlocked by default.

4- C) +1. Love to see side armor and making rear armor REALLY weak (specially on the Tiger). If engine damage from normal shots could be more frequent and only happen when shooting the rear dat would be great.


I know its gonna be tempting attacking OP with L2P, but just focus on what i said and what i think OP wants (ABC)

My 2cents of what needs to get improved: retweaking the old/vanilla commanders.
PD: i dont think tanktraps would hurt if they were not doctrinal and with higher HP

I wanted to say i love/hate when vet 2 P4s deflects ram. That´s it.

Keep fighting.

But it could be rather a buff on radio intercept. I mean, you would get the intel seconds earlier before the unit arrives (normally without false intel).

Early game wont change anything (you would be just delaying your troops on the field by canceling and he just needs to read the last sentence)

Anyway, just build barbwire.