Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: why arranged team ladder can meet solo ladder player!4 Dec 2020, 18:57 PM Cause this game doesn't have at any time +100K players online for it to be a viable solution. As far as i know, games with 2x/3x times our pop (AOE2) doesn't have this option. Heck SC2 which IIRC had at some time +2million players each month, you still faced arranged teams with randoms if you went higher in the ladder. In: Lobby
Thread: Random OKW in team games – blood, guts and glory4 Dec 2020, 18:41 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2020, 18:07 PMT.R. Stormjäger I've thought of that, but that's literally gonna open the door to 4v4 toxicity and teamkilling to an unprecedented degree. Multiple caches on one point sounds implausible without mod tools. Point 1 only goes if point 2 is possible in any sort of way. Although the reason it's not toxicity rather than denying options to players. The CoH2 team base playerbase is already a bit too snowflaky and prone to toxicity, if someone wants to team kill or troll they will found any excuse to behave in that way. I've seen this exact same excuse in other games (MOBAs) which forces you way more to interact with your teammates. People afraid of abilities which interact with allied players and how they can potentially be used to grief. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Idea: OKW truck redeploy4 Dec 2020, 17:10 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2020, 17:00 PMVipper Yes there is way to make cheat and make it possible Now that you mention it, is is the all units mod? Not sure how compatible that would be with the current tech system nor if it passes normal game standards. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Idea: OKW truck redeploy4 Dec 2020, 16:54 PM Is there code or animations for it? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: General Balancing Ideas4 Dec 2020, 16:52 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2020, 11:06 AMkamokaizen Yes i know, this could be automatic for all players, doesnt it? A toggle option in the menu and add a compass indicator on the minimap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Random OKW in team games – blood, guts and glory4 Dec 2020, 16:48 PM 1- Caches shouldn't provide resources to team mates. They should be like Opel Blitz. 2- Different people should be able to build multiple caches on the same point or add a way to "attach" to them for a lesser cost. In order to avoid people fighting over points. 3- OKW could get an upgrade on each deployed based which would let them act as a cache as long as they are on a point and no more than 1 will work per point. More or less making reference to their initial design without forcing them to be in the front. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: General Balancing Ideas3 Dec 2020, 19:28 PM I applaud the effort but i don't see anything of this happening. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Okw vs USF balance plz3 Dec 2020, 19:25 PM The real Kepler would be ashamed. Read the changelog, the dodge is planned to be nerfed and as other have explained there's no reason a Volks would ever trade effectively against a double bar Rifle at 10 range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion3 Dec 2020, 19:18 PM I'm also curious what triggered the sniper nerf In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback3 Dec 2020, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 08:27 AMTheMachine It's a nice idea but I think giving PTRS Penals more late game scaling (with a second +2x PTRS upgrade at T4) is better because then Soviets have good mobile infantry-based anti-tank. Dealing with Elefant/Jagdtiger + Panzerwerfers/Stukas in team games is so obnoxious because Ziss guns die to the Rocket Artillery and and SU-85's die to the heavy TD's. All Soviets can really do was ram cheese but now that's been heavily nerfed. Whereas both USF and British have much easier times with Bazookas and Piats as well as turreted Tank Destroyers that can flank. Having mobile squads with AT on Soviets gives a lot more potential and opens strategic options. A second PTRS upgrade at T4 allows for late game scaling without being too strong against LV's or Mediums in the mid game. Because the main problem with PTRS as an AT weapon is reliability and micro. It's a defensive weapon that only punishes people who stay for a long time and are indecisive in regards of what they want to do. All other AT Infantry can just shoot a rocket and move while reloading. If for whatever reason the targets leaves range by the time the weapon finishes aiming you have to repeat the process. What makes Penals threatening to an Ele/JT is their AT satchel not their PTRS. I think there are 2 complete different issues. 1- PTRS doesn't make Soviets have a mobile AT platform in the same way all 4 other factions have. 2- Giving them another 2x PTRS will indeed increase their AT capabilities and make them not be dead weight. I just think IMO, that Penals would had been much better as purely AI units with AI upgrade which can tech AT nades for making their satchel sticky and any early AT they required would be supplemented by the 45mm. Also PTRS are not good enough against FHT, Flak HT nor Ostwind. In: COH2 Balance