Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: The problem with SHOCKS is....10 Apr 2015, 17:22 PM Luvnets > /thread Anyway: you can always use attack ground with Flah HT. Problem solved. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic: Wolfs Lair - Minor Update10 Apr 2015, 15:09 PM Besides fixing the spawn locations, it would be good if it was tweaked like Minsk Pocket. -Open up a bit the middle and change the covers. It's freaking impossible to maneuver with middles, specially when wrecks blocks the road. -Open up routes through the forest, which at least, infantry could use. In: Lobby
Thread: The Mortar Thread10 Apr 2015, 05:32 AM "Don't put mortars on cover", try to hide them behind houses and if you have time spread out the crew with a vehicle. Since a couple of patches ago you can know how a squad will deploy so make use of it. For instance, i would put an MG spread out and then build sandbags in front so as to not get it 1 shot by indirect/nades. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzergrenadiers underperforming (with video proof)10 Apr 2015, 01:31 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2015, 23:57 PMZyllen Eh what situation are you referring to mate? here is the deal why should i use expensive pg's when i get more flexibility and firepower with the flmethrower pio's? in fact some higher level players you see players going straight for the double flame pio's and rarely bother with pg's. The one shown in Australianmagic video. PG are not meant to be get 100% of the time nor are non brainers as getting LMG grens. I feel like it's harder to justify more than one of them on 1v1 but the thing is that you don't always have enough munitions to get LMG + flamer + medics + tellers around, so PG is a MP option to have appreciable DPS. In: Lobby
Thread: about the USF light AT mine9 Apr 2015, 22:21 PM -Deploy 3 mines -Move 10m and put another 3 -Rinse and repeat -Pray -???? -Profit Don't rely on them that they WILL stop a vehicle like a conventional mine. Rather than advice you from a vehicle flank and with some luck you'll get a crit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzergrenadiers underperforming (with video proof)9 Apr 2015, 22:10 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2015, 21:42 PMZyllen Its simply a question of cost efficiency. and the pg simply do not have it. @australianmagic if i put a lmg gren squad their the results ( the soviet player was also terrible) would have been the same with less mp loss. if i want a powerful close combat unit then i take the pio with a flamethrower. On that specific situation, not. At those ranges, PG have 100%-50% more DPS in combination with RA. In: Lobby
Thread: about the USF light AT mine9 Apr 2015, 18:30 PM Praise the RNG gods, and they shall reward you. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 1+ hour slugfest, Lefh 18 MVP8 Apr 2015, 22:40 PM Note: friendly fire, is not friendly. Dat Sector artillery. In: Replays
Thread: Panzergrenadiers underperforming (with video proof)8 Apr 2015, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2015, 16:09 PMAlexzandvar Most engagements happen at long or close range, there are 4 units with assault rifles in this game and none of them are Allies. What incentive is there for an Allied player to sit in the Pgrens perfect target zone when they excel at either long range with para LMG or rifle 1919's or ass hugging range in the case of shocks? Carbines (Penals, Paratroopers; other units not worth mentioning) and USF have Bars. People tend to polarize everything saying that either it's hugging or max range. I'll remember you that cover is meant to be use and theres plenty of engagements at mid range. Carbines/Assault Rifles (in a general sense) are meant to work according to what type of unit you are engaging. SMG: engage at distance. Rifle/LMG: engate at close range Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2015, 16:02 PMJohnnyB Disagree. Please notice that the "hoorah" approach would have been done from side while pzgrens were engaged in combat with the guard squad and the following battle would have taken place without pzgrens benefiting of green cover, because cover is directional. How could 2 cons squad not effectively engage that pzgren squad from close distance with no cover involved? Even better, the cons would have been positioned on the pzgrens retreating path. Let's not try to avoid noticing obvious things just to contradict someone. Cause you are not trading cost effectively. You are securing a victory with heavy losses and munition expenditure, when you can do the same by just soft retreating the guards and using proper cover and micro movements In: Lobby
Thread: Panzergrenadiers underperforming (with video proof)8 Apr 2015, 15:59 PM For the 100th time, Assault Rifles =/= SMGs. They are not strictly meant to engage at close range. In: Lobby