Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Jackson spam2 Jun 2015, 14:52 PM I wonder if there is someone who agrees with OP at this point... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Skilled players,levels,Smurfs etc.2 Jun 2015, 14:51 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2015, 13:03 PMGrumpy +1 - If someone who is good is smurfing and they win all 10 games to get a rank, that rank would probably be at worst 3000, and wouldn't drop anyone's elo rank that much, unless it was another elite that they beat. Creating a second account, comparing the win rate to your primary, and then deciding that your losses were because of noobs is misleading. If you play the second account enough, you'll end up matched against the people who gave your first account its win/loss ratio. Occasionally, I run into people who aren't even prestige 1 yet they play much better than some of the prestige 3's. It isn't a big deal. Save the replay, watch it, learn, and go on. If they win all their first 10 games, i'll say you are probably top100/200 FOR SURE. In: Lobby
Thread: It is OK to have tank with invisibility in this game?1 Jun 2015, 22:45 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jun 2015, 22:18 PMAchtAchter OP wants to remove the ability completely, instead of removing this one, why not making the other abilities of the units in game better all together? Soviets e.g. are in dire need of having better vet abilities. I'm just against suggestions that make the game more monotonous and reduce possible strategies. I fail to see OP asking for the removal of the ability. People reads what they want to read. So you are in favour of making units with camouflage been able to cloak as quickly after or during combat? I'm ok with the ability as a tool to ambush or first strike, but not as an escape tool. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bring back The Scheldt for 3v3 and 4v4?1 Jun 2015, 22:14 PM I'll rather have more maps in rotation with more personal vetoes or as Jadame suggest, maps with automatic vetoes. In: Lobby
Thread: It is OK to have tank with invisibility in this game?1 Jun 2015, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jun 2015, 21:16 PMAchtAchter So after the KT has been nerfed and the panther has been indirectly nerfed people try to make "forgotten" units more viable and suddenly 1 YEAR AFTER wfa got released people complain that the JP4 is op and needs a nerf, because it's actually doing its job, destroying vehicles. If the JP4 was op or its vet 1 ability it was also already one year ago and nobody complained, why the sudden change? We're in the mood to make another OKW OP thread just for the gold old memories? Way to overreact. I guess if there was an allied unit doing the same like NDA NDA, you wouldn't be complaining right? I'm not sure but i think OKW cloak (JLI&Falls) works differently than OH one. I think that OKW units can cloak while on retreat if they go through cover while it's not the same for OH using the doctrinal ability. Anyway, Damage bonus is fine (it's vet5 after all), problem is the mechanic of cloaking (doing so midcombat or inmediatly after shooting). It's not OP/Broken, rather than it's just needs rework like many other things in the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Vehicle1 Jun 2015, 17:42 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jun 2015, 16:25 PMWhySooSerious its a 30% damage buff, it used to be a 50% buff but that was too strong. Personally I think Mark Target is stupid, just give soviet tanks HEAT shells that increase damage for 30 munitions on the tank that the ability was activated on. It used to stack also. And unless the changelog is wrong, it's 35% damage buff. In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Jackson spam31 May 2015, 21:45 PM More like 2 Ultralisk vs 1 Colossus. At least make the right conversion In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Top 20 Trash Talkers get shat on30 May 2015, 19:34 PM Kill them with kindness. Passive agressive ftw. In: Replays
Thread: Jackson spam30 May 2015, 19:28 PM If they only fixed AP shells, everything would be fine. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Skilled players,levels,Smurfs etc.30 May 2015, 16:18 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2015, 08:25 AMJohnnyB And what percentage of it? Here is where we touch the probem. If such a player is automatched with a 24/7 coh player but with lower stats (because smurf account) he will be smashed. This is where it becomes unfair. Twister explains it well. Unless the smurf is conceding 50% of it's games, he won't have a low ranking if he is a good player. Also, having "several" abandoned account doesn't work, cause the ladder decay is so slow that it won't move you too much (haven't play a random 2v2 game on more than a year and it still shows up as 1400). In: Lobby