Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: (may preview) Sturmpioneer Veterancy needs to be looked at8 May 2016, 22:01 PM It's not hard to understand. If SP is meant to KEEEP SHRECK, then veterancy must be reworked (same happened with Volks, even during the era with limited resources). Stun nades across the board need proper fixing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance thought and fixes!!8 May 2016, 20:34 PM Jump back to quoted post8 May 2016, 18:57 PMsquippy No, it really isn't. It would only be true if this was a game of pure intellect, but this is very much not the case. Even then, understanding wouldn't necessarily translate into being able to talk about it. This is a dumb idea which should be stopped immediately. You cut out the part where i said "Specially if you say you have been playing against others "pros"." Those kind of remarks are hard to believe when you have no replays/playercard backing those claims. Thing is, "balance" suggestions change considerably depending skill levels and game modes. If someone complains about emplacements, i directly assume we are talking about any teamgame mode and not 1v1. If someone complains about sniper, i'll assume 1v1 or 2v2 oppose to 3v3+. Allies have slightly higher w/l at higher ELO but it's the opposite at low ELO, etc. There's a difference between presenting a well thought argument, backed up by stats, and spewing personal opinions. If you present a post with the former 2, no one is gonna complain about the lack of playercard. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance preview; KV1 still lumbering behind the rest7 May 2016, 20:02 PM Vet overhaul > yes please Health increase > maybe. Cost/CP could be tweak In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Hetzer7 May 2016, 19:38 PM I wonder who voted for overperforming In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff for storm officer (OKW)7 May 2016, 19:35 PM Meh, i feel like it's just lazy job of not giving it a proper veterancy. Nerf vet0 aura and make it scale with vet levels. At some vet level, consequences of officer dying could be changed to pinned/suppressed instead of retreat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU 152 AP ROUNDS need pen buff?7 May 2016, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2016, 17:10 PMGdot We nerfed it since it was too OP having great AT/AI ability. Not sure why we would go back. Pick one - not both. +1 I'll say that an AP pen buff is possible, only if you further increase the time it takes to switch from one type of shell into the other. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance thought and fixes!!7 May 2016, 19:24 PM It's good practice to show a playercard in order for people to know at what skill levels the changes are been thought off, game mode preference and experience. Specially if you say you have been playing against others "pros". ON: overall, there is too much thoughts here thrown around. There are sensible changes, there are weird changes and there are obvious nope changes. Note: i don't like most of the values, but i will vote mostly on the concept of the change. *Yes* *Maybe, inclined to yes* *Maybe inclined to no* No In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Battlefield 1 (WWI)6 May 2016, 23:08 PM This time i'll give it a week/month despite of what xp a possible beta can throw. #NeverforgetBF4release In: Other Games
Thread: Relic: Week 1 Update to the Balance Mod6 May 2016, 21:21 PM If shrecks are back, faust needs to be removed. If shrecks are gonna be on SP, they need to rework their veterancy. Same thing happened with Volks (basically replacing accuracy buff for cooldown). Jump back to quoted post6 May 2016, 07:54 AMButcher I think a very important part of whether the Schreck on Sturmpios is going to work might be the repair kit. To prevent spamming Schrecks as a no brainer the player could be forced to make a choice: Either repair kit OR Schreck. Spamming repair Sturmpios + Schreck could possibly be a bit too much. People would get the upgrade for the sweeper, not for the repair. Cause you can get easily vet2 with shrecks, you would get the extra repairs anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: Which builds/strats are widely considered "abuse?"5 May 2016, 23:36 PM Are you looking for "cheese" strats or things that will make people rage?. Which in fact is not actually cheese in the proper sense (strats which are meant to take the opponent by surprise but are easy to defeat once scouted or prepared for). SU: Ghost sandbags, Clowncars (against OKW), double snipers (a. OH), maxim spam, Su76 spam into call ins, dshk spam, M4C, demos, flares/mines in doors, FHQ all in strats, Partisan maphack... OH: Double sniper, 222 spam, PW s. , PV s. , Osstruppen, Assault Gren s. just to lose with enough VP difference to gain faction choice , Stug-e into Tiger, Command PIV, CAS, Strafe + Stuka dive bomb... USF: Rifle spam, Rifle zook/bar blob, RET zook blob, decrew to get more popcap, CalliOP, demo, M10 crush... OKW: Volk shreck blob, Stuka, JPIV phaseshifting, Command PV mark vehicle, PF-JLI s., Vet4 Obers, Ghost wire, Ghost sandbags, JT on certain maps, Falls to kill Katyushas, Sturmtiger, Kubel maphack, IR HT + suppression maphack... UKF: Double sniper, Emplacement spam, Cancer commander, demos, RE spam, RE piat blobs, Comet s., most UKF offmaps (arty cover, 1 shotting OKW buildings), Cromwell crush, firefly tulips shots... In: COH2 Gameplay