Profile of link0

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 337

General Information


Thread: Panzergrens10 Jan 2014, 20:19 PM Lol is this thread a joke? Pgrens are very easy to deal with even with just conscripts. They are just huge manpower sinks. LMG grens are IMO, so much better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is IS2 so godly, and tiger is so shitty?10 Jan 2014, 20:05 PM If anything, the Tiger needs to be more expensive. AT guns are quite good right now, they have the highest penetration values of any weapon in the game and are fairly cheap in this patch. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is IS2 so godly, and tiger is so shitty?10 Jan 2014, 07:04 AM I believe the Tiger beats the IS-2 in 1on1 very slightly. IS-2 is undoubtably better against infantry though. If anything, the Tiger is OP because it's significantly cheaper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods9 Jan 2014, 20:20 PM I like COH more than SC because I like COH's focus on small scale tactical positioning over the macro strategy/timing/scouting that starcraft focuses on. I hate the RNG in COH, but don't hate it enough to stop playing an otherwise great game. I could not care less about the themes. Both themes are very cool. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to nerf RNG gods9 Jan 2014, 20:16 PM RAM = Stun is a good idea. It should be rarely used. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods9 Jan 2014, 19:14 PM We do accept the RNG in this game, because that's a set in stone game design choice by the developers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to nerf RNG gods9 Jan 2014, 07:11 AM Yup, just remove flame crits and just buff their normal damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods8 Jan 2014, 21:58 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2014, 21:26 PMMetaStable14 If the RNG can't even out unless multiple games are played then the RNG is implemented poorly and skill is less important. RNG should balance out within each game - or close to it. Player skill should be the deciding factor in each game. +1. A better player should NEVER have to lose to a much worse player even for 1 game. You don't get to play against that same player 100 games over and over again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shocktroops at 1CP8 Jan 2014, 07:01 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2014, 03:04 AMPorygon This argument is the worst I read from you. Back in COH1, US need to forgone Rifles to get early super sniper, did USA sniper be better than the wehr one? Did US MG better than MG42? Early tech path should mean nothing to unit design. Sniper is a very special unit in COH and should not be that different. Now it comes out survival of Soviet sniper is much better, with some ridiculous running ability even more help in their survival chance. It also destroy the good old counter-sniping art of the old game. How about this? Soviet sniper squad can no longer be reinforce? Well, the soviet T1 building costs a lot more and doesn't offer the same breath of unit options that the German t1 building offers. Also, the Soviet sniper is only a bit better overall, it's not that big of a deal. The German sniper cloaks much faster. The main problem right now is that the German sniper is bugged and doesn't auto fire 100% of the time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shocktroops at 1CP7 Jan 2014, 21:18 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2014, 19:22 PMslother I agree on hp buff and armor nerf, but then again they are still more vulnerable to explosions which in my opinion is issue with ost sniper. Soviet snipers can be hit by mortar shell/panzerwerfer/pak/zis/tank shell and still be lucky enough for other entity to run away. I had so many situations when I barraged Soviet sniper with panzerwerfer and yet they still manage to run away. The soviet sniper is designed to be better than the OST sniper. That's just part of the game design. This is because the Soviet T1 building locks you into one tech path and is also much more expensive than the OST T1 building. In: COH2 Balance