Profile of Firesparks

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1930

General Information


Thread: t34/85 is a bit too cheap17 Jul 2016, 00:08 AM the t34/85 is a bit too cheap since the last patched buffed the mg on the t34/85. I wouldn't say it's broken, but it should be made a bit more expensive, something like 385mp 135fuel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: on the ptrs16 Jul 2016, 23:31 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2016, 23:18 PMTiger Baron Different? If you mean different from the Boys AT rifle and the German Panzerbusche then yes, a bit, if you mean from the Polish variant, then no, it was entirely copied, like the PPSh, by MissCommissar's "glorious" Soviets. the guard PTRS and conscript PTRS uses different game file with different performance. the conscript PTRS is a lot worst. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal squads flamethrowers15 Jul 2016, 11:05 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2016, 10:15 AMRiCE Balance wise its not a weakness, since ALL infantry get suppressed. Its like you would say their advantage is the two leg they have, so they are not stationary unit. Its true, but the same can be said about all infantry units. You don't have to worry about smoke when facing penal. The smoke ability on the rifleman and shock are very useful against mg. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How would you address new factions' powercreep?15 Jul 2016, 02:56 AM this is how game diversity dies, with double lmg, 5 men, and terminator vet for grenadier and volks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How would you address new factions' powercreep?14 Jul 2016, 20:58 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jul 2016, 01:42 AMUlaire Minya Recieved acc nerfs across the board that would probably hurt the grenadier more than it hurts the allies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal squads flamethrowers12 Jul 2016, 23:36 PM compared to the lmg blob, penal is pretty tame. they are strong, but not game breakingly so. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Swap Puma with 251/1711 Jul 2016, 20:29 PM you should really make the flak ht actually decent before swapping it In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: So what can we/Relic do to fix USF Mortar spam?11 Jul 2016, 10:16 AM Just nerf it. The USF mortar is simply ridiculous. even just making the USF mortar into a wehr mortar clone would be a huge nerf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make Ostheer lategame great again!10 Jul 2016, 22:10 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2016, 09:54 AMTiger Baron The Wehr are suffering a lot more early game tha the OKW right now due to the shitty survivability of their mainline infantry if not again for their othet 2 infantry units, those being the pioneers and PGs. And late game due to their underperforming armor compared to all other Armies. So the most logical step is to buff them, if you don't agree with that then suggest something else but don't bash our opinions just because you think yours is superior or something, if half the forum is suggesting a certain buff then it's up for debate and testing, not being bashed by some new comer modder that thinks he has some people here's experience and knowledge of how the game works. there are other ways of buffing the wehr without giving them a fifth man, which would destroy their identity. Better squad spacing and better received accuracy are two examples. and the problem is the power creep on the USF and mortars in generals. and I've already made my suggestions here: https://www.coh2.org/topic/51037/firesparks-balance-mod and let's not get into a pissing contest about who's been playing the game longer. and regarding tiger: It's a victim of the introduction of the King Tiger. The King tiger is significantly better armed and armored while the difference in speed isn't that great. The allied TD are tuned to counter King tiger but it leave the tiger in the dust. Tiger is bit a faster but not fast enough to make a difference. Either the Tiger get buffed into a King Tiger clone or the Tiger get a mobility buff to differentiate it from the King Tiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some ideas to improve Wehrmacht10 Jul 2016, 21:58 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2016, 18:10 PMJohnnyShaun As i said, i play mainly soviet and i honestly don't care about buffing OH. It just would be more challenging to play against AND fit with OH theme which is combined arm AND unit preservation. And frankly, it's just minor changes, unlike elchino post which is a total Ostheer rework. there are way to make grenadier more viable without giving them a fifth man. Received accuracy and squad spacing are two example. giving grenadier a 5th destroy their identity. Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2016, 17:16 PMelchino7 Powercreep is not a problem as long as you balance accordingly. Either you nerf all the new things or you just buff the ol things to the new standard. What's easier: nerfing and adjusting 3 factions (USF-OKW-UKF) or just buffing/adjusting 1.5 factions (OH mostly as SU receive it's proper QOL on this patch) A 5th man should not be priority but i don't see it bad on trying it. buffing everything into a homogeneous mess destroy everyone's identity. Already people are just ignoring the existence of Bar and turning their rifleman into dual m1919a6 terminator. Rifleman are just uber grenadier in the current meta. If the grenadier get buffed into the same broken status, the game will just devolve into lmg blob vs lmg blob. Even if that's balanced, it completely destroy gameplay or any uniqueness. In: COH2 Gameplay