Profile of sherlock

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 550 | Subs: 1

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/il_sherlock_ll


Thread: Suggestion- unique Flamethrower Rifleman unit21 Sep 2015, 12:46 PM Good idea Strumming. Another would be to just replace the rifle flamethrower with an assault engineer call-in. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Bans and Maplist discussion thread19 Sep 2015, 14:06 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2015, 13:03 PM__deleted__ Cruzz is still stuart bug with stun shock real or the fixed it ? (i cant find it in changelog) If you're referring to the bug that allows you to get the stuart to always use the stun rounds, then yes, it's still in the game. It's tricky to do however and if you use the ability again it will fix it. Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2015, 13:47 PMpugzii Banning the Vickers is just ridiculous. You might aswel just remove British Forces from the available armies for the torny. They can't fight without the Vickers, they're more dependant on it than the Wehr. This torny is screwed before it even began because of Relic. I said before and before that there should be an official balance patch developed by the community for this torny. Relying on Relic is never the option to take, and now we have a literally destroyed allied army because of it. I don't know why they wouldn't ask Cruzzi to fix it. He probably would have a mod fixing it in an hour or so. In: Operation Charlie Fox
Thread: The 17 ninjas19 Sep 2015, 00:37 AM Can someone with some connection to relic please make sure they see this? Also, huge thanks to Cruzzi, as always In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: September 17th Patch18 Sep 2015, 12:38 PM Thompsons: Someguy beat me to it M5 mine: The paratrooper support squad also get access to the mine, which makes the commander maybe a bit more desirable. Thanks for the analysis In: News
Thread: Kyle_RE16 Sep 2015, 15:11 PM Kyle is great. Nice initiative In: Fan Clubs
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/09/201514 Sep 2015, 22:16 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 21:32 PMAlexzandvar 2. The fact that the Para's have two LMG's instead of one. This is not quite right. In coh2 having 1 lmg that does as much damage as 2, which is the case for the lmg34, has always been better because it focuses the damage on a single entity of a squad and kills it quickly hence reducing the other squads effectiveness. 2 lmgs will spread their damage damage. Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 21:32 PMAlexzandvar 3. They have a man up on Obers. 2. Paras are 6 men squads, Obers 4. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Base Reorganization Concept12 Sep 2015, 12:14 PM Please Relic, can we have this? Very nice idea Mr. Someguy. In: Lobby
Thread: Should nades get a nerf?6 Sep 2015, 22:11 PM There is only one issue with nades which is that they completely ignore cover at the moment. This will be fixed if the preview patch is any indication. Other than that nades are fine. They are a way of countering vet other than vehicles which is a good thing for all factions and they are skill based: you can move out of the way, position your units in green cover etc. The only exception here can be rifle grenades since the animation can bug out (no early indicator) and the nade warning triggers to late (when the nade is already half way - no time to move out of the way). They also allow to be used more easily behind shot blockers, since if you don't spot the animation, the chances or moving out of the way in time when you see it coming towards you are rather slim, other nades still have the time counter. The new unit spacing out of cover also severely limit how effective nades are now. In summation grenades are fine once the cover bonus is applied again. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Volks veterancy vs Brits6 Sep 2015, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2015, 03:24 AMAntilles950 - It's difficult to kill Infantry Section models; each one has a lot of hp, and models seem to survive until VERY low levels of squad health, so they can retreat with 3 or 4 man squads with very low health. Each entity has 80 health like others in the game. It's mainly their target size of 0.8 (1 or close to it, is the norm for vet 0) and the cover bonus combined with volks accuracy that makes them durable. Forcing them to move out of cover for example with a sturmpio will help a lot because tommy's have really bad moving accuracy. Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2015, 03:24 AMAntilles950 - There's no weapons upgrades for volks, so it never really gets easier to vet down the line, while brit lmgs wreck volks Volks main source of vet in any other matchup is vehicle damage in most cases. As you identify correctly, there isn't much vehicle play to be expected from UKF until later. ISGs work well against UKF Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2015, 09:43 AMKatitof In cover about as strong as grenadiers, out of cover about as strong as osttruppen.(no exaggeration here). According to Cruzzi, the cover bonus rate of fire is 20%. I'd expect them to still clearly outperform osttruppen out of cover. Moving accuracy is however amongst the worse for any unit at 0.25. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 02:32 AMbC_ will be adding to next revision Thanks. ~~Strumming and I found a bug with elite riflemen in the 1v1s we played to test the mod. They still come onto the field with vet 2.~~ [see post above] In: Lobby