Profile of Reverb

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 327

General Information
Birthday: 2021-01-05


Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds17 Aug 2018, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Aug 2018, 18:16 PMOutsider_Sidaroth Willy Pete is fine, it counters static play, as it should. Again, I'm not ragging on the incendiary ability itself, its the fact that it slows units to a crawl, even in retreat to the point where they will receive 1% health. Incendiary for punishing static play is good, its the slowing action on retreat that is stupid. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Utterly Atrocious Vehicle Pathing17 Aug 2018, 11:13 AM Easily the most irritating/infuriating aspect of the game. Panzer IV runs over a car and a big pile of gas barrels just fine, makes it to a twig on the ground and starts spinning like a top. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds17 Aug 2018, 02:21 AM Point of issue is not the damage the incendiary does, its specifically how it traps units, even retreating ones. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal Battalions Balanced patch from Relic *Sarcasm17 Aug 2018, 02:18 AM The argument was presented that Volks are underpowered/lackluster in this thread, when they are not. I used Riflemen as a comparison. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds16 Aug 2018, 20:17 PM Walking stuka is entirely avoidable by paying attention to sound cues. USF WP does not give a sound cue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal Battalions Balanced patch from Relic *Sarcasm16 Aug 2018, 20:10 PM Vanilla Volks put out the same DPS at mid range as Vanilla Riflemen at 30 MP less, and have more accuracy, they are not weak at all, if anything they are the most cost effective main infantry in the game and possibly OP. You lost that engagement because you played it wrong. 1 penal in green cover will wreck 2 volks in no cover. Not hard to see what you did wrong, dunno why you are having such a hard time with this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds16 Aug 2018, 20:01 PM How do people feel about these rounds slowing the movement of the units caught in them? It seems OP to have units greatly slowed down to me, even in retreat the units move at a snails pace...these are rounds you often cannot avoid and they have a quite large area of effect. I think its great that the Mortar trucks have the ability to launch incendiary, but how it basically snares units is unbalanced, especially since even units in retreat are slowed as well. They should act like other incendiary where the units are burned if you do not react to the action, not instantly taken down to 1% health regardless of your action. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers16 Aug 2018, 19:58 PM Vickers is on par with the MG42 imo, similar wide arc, while it doesn't suppress as fast, its damage is very useful- IE theres a MG42 in that garrison? Put a Vickers in the garrison next to it and watch it melt the MG42 out of the garrison. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How is ranking in 4v4 determined?15 Aug 2018, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2018, 15:47 PMTobis Because the game tries to match you with whomever is searching for a game at the same time. It would work better if there were more players playing. If your rank with random 4v4s is low you're kinda screwed. It's pretty much entirely random who is going to have the worse teammates. Back when I played 4v4 randoms a bit for fun, I was playing soviets and doing retarded spam strats to mess around. Tanked my elo there. It's pretty much unplayable now, everyone it matches me with is god-awful. It would require insane amounts of effort to raise my elo to get out of those ranks. It's entirely dependent on which team gets lucky and has the least bad players. Moral of the story is start out good This is exactly what happened, in the first 10 games (these are with a smurf account) in Soviet and OKW, no one dropped, no one was AFK, everyone in the match was a good player, the result of which was high rank after the first 10 matches (Soviet had 100% win rate, OKW had 70% win rate). When I did this with OST, the first 4 games had AFK players, probably 6-7 of them had people on my team that dropped after 1-2 minutes, the result of which was a 10% win rate and rank 2500 or so....now if I play Soviet or OKW in 4v4, they are mostly enjoyable, but every single game with OST is anal cancer, and I mostly lose the matches, further sinking rank, making them progressively more and more cancerous. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How is ranking in 4v4 determined?15 Aug 2018, 15:22 PM I'm often the only person in the entire team that builds caches in OST games, something I have noticed is that the worst performing member of the team is always the person next to me (in terms of splitting a 4v4 map in half between two players each vying for a fuel/muni/VP on the sides. I know stats don't tell the whole story, but when you have multiple times the amount of the other team members across the board, that does speak to having to carry the entire match, over and over, especially the point capture stats. Just trying to figure out why factions with poor rank equates to horribly balanced/organized matches, while high rank generally receives competitive/well balanced matches IE the game is enjoyable with high rank but very irritating with low rank. In: COH2 Gameplay