Profile of Jae For Jett

Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2018, 15:54 PMGI John 412

It is a well known fact that the lack of a snare, outside of a doctrine, for the UKF is a very troublesome part of why they poor UKF havevsuch a high loss rate in the recent GCS2 opening rounds.

Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2018, 02:44 AMCieZ

stuff

Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2018, 00:15 AMferwiner

I agree that RNG adds a lot to this game and is a great feature. It adds risk management as a needed skill and makes the matches look much more realistic. On the other hand what you describe is certainly doable. In fact that is what most old rts games do. You always hit with direct fire. You always hit the ground where enemy was positioned with indirect. You can take down a building with a sword if you wait long enough. Yes, this is totally stupid, but this is how the games we've been brought up worked when you think of it

Of course, adding such a mode to coh2 makes no sense. Both of these are fair. The rng based model just needs a 10 minute statistic course to understand why... and other than that has only advanatages.

Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2018, 20:15 PMruleworld

This should not be the case. The random factor should be a fixed number (maybe 0.5) instead of polling it from a pseudo random number generator. It should be absolutely easy to change, maybe just a few lines of code. The game should be balanced from the beginning anyway. If not then at least you can play against the same faction in a mirrored map which would give you 100% balanced game.

most definatly not. If 2x BAR rifles and bren IS go toe to toe with obers they won't be "easily accessible" so long as they arrive at 10 minutes.



Suppression is not affected by accuracy. It is affected by RoF. I can have 0 accuracy and still suppress something with an HMG.