Profile of Cresc

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 378

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/crescent_bretzel
Steam: 76561198162641695


Thread: IS2- Is it worth buying?3 Dec 2018, 23:43 PM The IS2 is fine, why would it need a buff? I'm not sure how it's situational, so far in Soviet's current meta everything is situational except penals and guards. Depending on your build, saving for an IS2 is always worth it if it's part of your late game strategy and say you can provide yourself with Zis guns. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind3 Dec 2018, 19:31 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2018, 17:26 PMWiderstreit Who needs more AA as Ostheer? 222 and all useful tanks have MG42 on turret. It should be a AI like Centaur is, because beside Brummbär Ostheer has no AI tank. Panzer IV is a joke in comparison with T34/76. And all commander-stuff is also not that great as well. Tiger is worse than Pershing and IS2. StuG E is worse than M8A1. Test my revamp-test-mod. I gave it a other weapon-profile. The Tiger is worse than an IS2, the Panzer 4 a joke compared with a T34/76? Please explain this to me, I need to be enlightened about these match-ups. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack3 Dec 2018, 19:28 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2018, 18:01 PMSander93 IMO the biggest reason of the success of the 251 is that usually Soviets refuse to build T2 in response/anticipation of it and instead always want to stick to Penals and Guards PTRS softcounter just to rush the T-70. Which doesn't end well a lot of the time. It's exactly the same when Ostheer refuses to hardcounter (i.e. Puma) the T-70 and stall for medium armor instead. It's a risk and sometimes it doesn't pay off. They refuse to build T2 in anticipation of the flame HT? That's your theory? Please show me your playercard, I want to make it certain you have more than 10 games played as soviets... The vet nerf changed absolutely nothing, this thing wrecks infantry in half a second, it will still vet in 2 minutes after getting an upgrade, besides already being an instawipe unit. I find it mindblowing that there are still players complaining about the t70 in its current state, if you think the t70 is op or that it "wipes" retreating units, you need to have your own play checked... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack3 Dec 2018, 17:37 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2018, 17:31 PMVipper 251 -Veterancy gain when upgraded with flamethrowers reduced by 50% You think this makes any difference whatsoever on how it impacts the pace? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack3 Dec 2018, 17:15 PM The recent balance patch focused too much on tweaking 2v2 play and dismissed this game breaking unit that has spreading nightmare and discord all over 1v1. Can we please fix this overperforming vehicle at least quicker than the fanboys can whine about it being overnerfed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?3 Dec 2018, 17:12 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2018, 10:42 AMDonnieChan i never had problems with the brummbär. allied airstrikes, mark target and tank destroyers make it more than counterable. your 6 men guard squads and 5 men tommy squads don't die anyway from 1 shot frm it. sherman vs grenadier is a much more bitter case in that regard. you still have to micro manage ost in a much more intensive way than brits and soviets with all those angles, flanks and mines... this game has much more serious issues: the uselessness of püppchen, the 120 mm mortar etc. You never did have a problem with brumbar because you're the abusing using it so stop lying, the playercard speaks for itself In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?2 Dec 2018, 09:52 AM This is where you wish replays didn't depend on patch updates. Even though my game against Donnie made for some good laugh, it was the most obvious instance of Brumbar overpowering every unit in the game. You have to be incredible deluded to claim that it was not, and that the patch "overnerfed it" did you even read the patchnotes? They only slightly reduced the armor value. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Early Panzer IV Counter?1 Dec 2018, 15:47 PM There is no magic to it, you need to get an anti-tank gun before the 10 minutes mark, with any allied faction. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Annoying call-in abuse on faymonville1 Dec 2018, 13:57 PM Very intense game with puma and commander panzer abuse vs barely no tank on my side. A good player with a very good sense of micro, but sadly had to rely on cheap overpowered call-ins to pull out a desperate victory, whenver he is outplayed him with fair and basic mine placement. Game drags on until the last second. Patience and high IQ skill prevails with the hardest faction. In: Replays
Thread: Buff Ostwind1 Dec 2018, 02:08 AM in what world the p4 is overperforming LMAO Ostwind is not viable because it doesn't do shit, and in the current meta it's not a viable option against the flurry of anty tank units allies can pull out. Unless you have a build that can blend well with ostwind it's not going to work. By blending I mean builds that work only in specific maps where you can use Paks and Stugs at your advantage. The p4 seems like a better option all the time. In: COH2 Balance