Profile of ZeroLithium

Jump back to quoted post14 Nov 2015, 21:48 PMZyllen

No they where not. the usf always had a stronger infantry then the ostheer. the problems for the usf was late game...

Jump back to quoted post14 Nov 2015, 22:21 PMPuppetmaster

If you had bothered to ever play USF you would know that before Rifles were buffed they would bleed USF a shit tonne which meant you often couldn't afford to buy armour because of the MP drain... Bars were also less useful since they have been buffed relatively recently.

Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 10:34 AMZeroLithium

I think one of the biggest changes possible would be to give frontline infantry the ability to upgrade from 4 to 5 units and bring them in line with every other faction.

Since Brit release, brit fanboys have been complaining about how expensive it is to reinforce their squads - but Ostheer are STILL at 30mp per gren but have no opportunity to increase squad sizes. So now Infantry sections outperform grens on many levels and reinforce cheaper, maybe Osther should benefit from this as well?

I would propose a fuel gated squad size increase in the T2 building similar in cost to the Brit version, increasing infantry (but not weapon teams) to 5 men. This should allow Ostheer infantry to be more survivable as a squad and scale better into the late game.

I think a nice feature would be to include an unlockable rally point at the command bunker. As it stands, most other factions (except Soviets) have a forward retreat point. The resource cost should be somewhat costly, and would make protecting your investment in a command bunker a priority.

Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 09:41 AMBananenheld

there is no strategy diverstiy in which way you cap and evreything is pretty static which encourages arty spamfests. 1v1 and 2v2 are just way more "mobile" and flexible how the maps are played