I think this is a better example https://www.twitch.tv/videos/128229773 (01:36:39)
True

Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?20 Mar 2017, 11:25 AM
In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?20 Mar 2017, 11:12 AM
Yeh ofc its usual that the MG42 lost the engagement, the ridiculous point is the speed of the loss. The first maxim just ran behind the truck at VP for green cover while being suppressed.. and would have most likely won the engagement alone. And tbh in a double MG42 vs garrisoned maxim engagement, I am really not sure if MG42 would win. Again, you can beat any strat in 1v1, even maxim spam (though Kholodny is one of the more broken maps for maxim spam sadly) if you play with 0 mistakes and u have some RNG luck while your enemy is sloppy. Wait, that's not even true. ![]() But tbh then pls tell me why we even adjust the balance of anything in this game, since you also can beat comet spam + arty cover if you play without any mistakes ![]() As people already mentioned, the maxim needs some sort of firepower advantage compared to MG42 since it has such a small arc of fire. Fine. The problem is a-moving with this unit. +This unit can react way too good on flanking attacks. That's why set up time needs to be nerfed
Plot-twist: After that match he queued again into VonIvan, but this time Luv was sov and Ivan OH. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?19 Mar 2017, 23:24 PM
Really? Because T70 received a nerf? Or did I miss that axis inf got anti-suppression buff and garrisoned inf no longer gets torn apart by the insane accurcacy + dps of maxims? As Luvnest said in this vid: Maxims are perfect mainline inf, perfect anti garrison and win every engagement with least micro input, especially with cons AT nade, some guards and T70 In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?19 Mar 2017, 22:44 PM
In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: GCS Tournament Announcement19 Mar 2017, 19:09 PM
Btw how does the hierarchy of the qualifiaction exactly work? For example, someone who only plays 2 factions (1 axe, 1 allie faction) but is #1 with them is better than someone who is lets say #1 with 1 faction and top 5 with all 4 others??? In: News |
Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?19 Mar 2017, 11:18 AM
i dont see maxim spam any differently than mg42 spam. you can have the huge arc of mg42 with 4 men or the narrower arc of the maxim with 6. yes i know maxims unpack fast but mg42 is not that slow either if you have the bulletin which affects it. Like skemshead already mentioned above: unfortunately your argument doesnt work because usually maxims win EVERY engagement vs MG42, no matter if the maxim is a-moving into a already set up MG42 (not joking) or if both players use the a-moving strat. The only 1:1 engagement that a MG42 will definitely win is if it's garrisoned while the maxim is not, or if the MG42 uses its incendiary rounds In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?18 Mar 2017, 18:08 PM
Man I hope so bad that they ban Mobile Assault and Tactical Support doctrine in GCS, just like they did in KotH. Nobody want's to see this ridiculously OP pudding anymore. But have to say that if they ban these, they also should nerf Command Panther and probably Mobile Defense too. Unfortunately I doubt that these changes would hit early enough.
This is a bit off-topic but removing flamer from penals was the best decision ever. Giving flamer to a durable 6-man squad was such a FailFish - design. We saw that problem with old USF Rifle Company In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Randoms vs sturmpanther team18 Mar 2017, 12:04 PM
![]() Even though the opponents are my mates LUL In: Replays |
Thread: GCS Tournament Announcement17 Mar 2017, 16:43 PM
Yup we need to take care of people who use a certain strategy to boost their ranks like our old comrade Zoobee ![]() In: News |
Thread: Is it possible to fix maxim spam before GCS?16 Mar 2017, 19:26 PM
![]() ![]() In: COH2 Balance |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
14 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
9 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0 |