Profile of Intelligence209

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1124

General Information
Register Time: 8 Jun 2015, 03:26 AM
Last Visit Time: 17 Sep 2019, 14:37 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Intelligence209
Steam: 76561198043779336
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Game Name: Intelligence209

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Why this game is starcraft ww2?20 Oct 2016, 00:45 AM https://www.coh2.org/topic/56840/allied-infantry-vs-axis-tanks OP i do get your point to an extent... its mindless blobbing that is more and more apparent in this game.. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks11 Oct 2016, 20:02 PM Panzerwerfers are non existant in 2v2s. Stukas are good, if the user knows how to use. Landmattress/calliopes are in nearly every game, both more then capable of easy wipes for OH. The commanders they come in are simply good. Good enough to get nearly every game. Everyone knows it's infantry you need late game. As to the main point, asked infantry "jack of all trade" units. Able to blobb with no real punishment or threat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks9 Oct 2016, 17:30 PM I completely ignored skabinsk post due to him being one of the most cheesy players in the game, The ultimate LMG rifle blobber. And his infamous maximum spam. Anyways, back on track.. THE PROBLEM IS ALLIED INFANTRY ABLE TO BLINDLY WALK UP TO AXIS LATE GAME ARMOUR WITH NO TRUE PUNISHMENT. AXIS (especially OH) gets punished in same cause even by allied light tanks. Purpose: buff axis late armour vs infantry. If its suppression via LMG. Or panther has same AI roll as cromwell, whatever. There is a reason why you dont see any gren LMG blobbing late game Or even strum pios due to having shrecks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks5 Oct 2016, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2016, 17:35 PMGrim I understand and acknowledge your argument, but i still beg to differ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks5 Oct 2016, 16:49 PM USF/UKF Able to equip all infantry with anti tank weapons and unskillfully blobb (even through red cover) towards both OKW/OH tanks with very minimal loss. Ostwind is not nearly as usefull as it should be, the accuracy is terrible. Outclassed completely by the Sherman/comet/cromwell in terms of A.I. P4 is "Okay" vs infantry but is quickly outclassed by most allied armour in terms of AT. So this unit i find not building over the stug. Panther is a joke vs AT and AI. But in this argument im on the AI side of things. You must have the tank pointed in the direction of the infantry unit to apply the slightest respectable amount of damage with all three MGs. My problem here is that, why as an OH player, am i being punished by allied armour if i blindly rush my unit to try to faust, or shreck a tank. Usually ends up in a 4 man squad wipe. Espeically by a cromwell. my problem again, is the lack of skill late game im seeing against expensive armour, to simply piat blobb, or zook blobb. With minimal losses, meanwhile an early game armour from the USF/UKF is simply able to point and wipe squads the second they are fielded. Then (UKF) armour late game is able to counter OH tier 3/4 tanks, and wipe squads no problem. Jack of all trade units that require minimal skill. TLDR; -OH AI tanks outclassed by USF/UKF armour -Allied infantry able to unskillfully blobb towards axis heavies with no real punishment. -You want MG42a to counter blobbs? Sorry a USF motor countered it cuz its stupidly accurate. I wrote this on the shitter at work. So yeah.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF instant critical repair26 Sep 2016, 03:22 AM its a OP ability. i never liked it from the start. i wouldnt know how to balance it out or what to replace it with tho.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes III - Your expectations21 Sep 2016, 21:42 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2016, 15:28 PMIntelligence209 I expect them to actually have a stable game that doesn't require a restart from time to time to avoid bug splats and crashes. To not hire a bunch of ..... who have no clue on what they are doing. To not make a 5 year plan then drag out balance issues for that duration just so they can keep their job. More advertising, more promotions, and more of an active communication. If a mod revise this post then you need to read your own rules. This site is held together by duck tape. so yeah I changed the word that might be found offensive. Other then that this is a reasonable reply to what I expect to see in coh3. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer - The Dead Circle vs USF21 Sep 2016, 15:21 PM USF motar just proved that relic staff is full of a bunch of dumbass. Don't expect a balance change any time soon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PzWerfer vs Calliope.13 Sep 2016, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 12:13 PMMr.Smith 1. Just no.. - Panzerwerfer rockets are (slightly) stronger than Katyusha rockets - ... they come down almost instantly - ... they still instapin. Do you have any stats/first-hand experience/whatever to back your claim up? 2. Alpha-strike long-range one-hit-wipe wonders are cancerous. We've already been experiencing this from September 2015 to March 2016 (?). There is no need to repeat the mistakes of the recent past... again. Honda Accord vs BMW 3 series. One is clearly better One is clearly more expensive One is more luxury and powerful One out numbers the other 10 to 1 on the road.... I'm sure you get my point there... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PzWerfer vs Calliope.13 Sep 2016, 11:29 AM Decrease reload time Increase durability Increase lethality Make it worth building again. Land mattress/USF motar/UKF motor, calliope, and Katusha all out perform werfers, in terms of cost per the unit and kills outcome. In: COH2 Gameplay