Profile of Kamzil118

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 455

General Information
Register Time: 28 Mar 2015, 03:09 AM
Last Visit Time: 24 Aug 2021, 21:13 PM
Website: https://forums.spacebattles.com/members/kamzil118.322196/
Steam: 76561197988442685
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Detroit
Game Name: Kamzil

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Allied 1v1 Dominace4 Jan 2016, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 23:05 PMBeefSurge ^wisdom. At its finest. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is new in 2016 in Company of heroes 2 ?4 Jan 2016, 17:33 PM It would nice to see Relic do Easter eggs in the game just to refer to Dawn of War 3. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 17:16 PMMyself My Apologies if you feel that I wrongly accused you of insulting me, you have not used any diminutive characterization toward me. Have to point out though that you have quoted a different reply... If we could only get back to topic... It is fine. It's good to hear that you've addressed that issue. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 17:11 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 17:03 PMMyself Do you see you name anywhere in that quote? is there any point in there where I claim that you Kamzil118 have insulted me? This is second time you respond without comprehending first and that slowdown the progress allot so once more PLS read more carefully before responding. I did, you mentioned me and three others. Then you started off with GUYS in the last paragraph, so that suggests that you were referring to me and the three others who you quoted and said that we were insulting you. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 16:45 PMMyself @any admin I am trying really hard to avoid responding to insults with insults and trolling with trolling. I also feel that I should not to spent most time in semiotics in balance thread. Can you pls advice some of the people in this thread that their approach is not constructive? I am not insulting you at all. I am merely pointing out a flaw in your reasoning. An understandable trait to any human being. Yet, you accuse me of insulting you when I was trying to elaborate that real life facts can be hardly be useful in this game and that it would be difficult to implement for a competitive point of view. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 16:16 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 15:33 PMMyself Although irrelevant once more you have been proven to be wrong. Zis has a barrage ability that use H.E. round instead of A.P thus claiming they "are not represented in game at all" is another mistake from you part (but who is counting). Truth is, that is a barrage ability only for that anti-tank gun. However, that simple ability with the Zis does not represent the five other anti-tank guns which are also capable of using HE shells, with the exception of the Raketenwerfer. Other than the barrage ability, anti-tank guns in this game only use AP shells cause if they had HE shells as well, they would be more likely to kill a model rather than miss and hit the dirt almost all the time. So Katitof has been able to make his point that this game does not throw in the stuff from real life, because if it did. You would definitely see a Panther break down in the middle of combat. Besides, the only thing close to a fortification is a ditch in the ground with an MG called a bunker. The British on the other hand is basically a support weapon surrounded by sandbags. Now if you want a real legit fortification, Poznan Citadel would be that fortification. Everything else would deemed as a defensive position specializing in a certain anti-unit role. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WTF is the logic behind the brace structure ability?31 Dec 2015, 00:12 AM This a l2p issue. Just get a flame halftrack or a mortar halftrack to firebomb it like it was Tokyo. If OKW, ISGs are the answer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen Up Close and Personal29 Dec 2015, 21:11 PM Don't forget to use the weapons rack to enhance the anti-infantry capabilities or the anti-vehicle power. I have a tendency to have two squads of riflemen with a BAR and a bazooka while I have a third squad that goes double BARs or act as my third squad with a BAR and a bazooka to at least force off the enemy vehicles or tanks. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Heavy Tank Use28 Dec 2015, 05:07 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 04:00 AMHans G. Schultz Anyone else remember when people could have an army of (3+) tigers if the match was stalled that long (Most likely annihilation gamemode)? I remember when CoH2 came out, there was a video of six IS-2s produced by this one player before he compstomped his opponent in 4v4. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF AA emplacement and retreating squads23 Dec 2015, 18:34 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 16:13 PMMyself Since this is not about a replay I uploaded or a game experience I described stop asking what I did or did not... Flanking moves are supposed to be rewarded not penalized. The AA emplacements have enough utility without the blocking or retreat paths at a significant area. Choosing retreat path in certain map is not really an option. And I still have not seen a singe argument why Bofors should be good at killing retreating infantries... This can be easily fixed Reducing damage to units on retreat without having any other impact on the A.A.E. Forgive me for asking those questions since I believe it was based off of experience. I know that the Bofors is good at what it does, but so does the tech building for the OKW. Last time I remembered, it had a reputation of protecting ISGs from flanking light vehicles and halting allied infantry in their tracks. So in other words, I don't see why a allied static building with a quick rapid anti-aircraft gun should get criticized if the OKW tech building does the same. In: COH2 Gameplay