Profile of G4bb4_G4nd4lf

No offense but the question is stupid. No faction needs to be nerfed.

OKW needs a design overhaul, no straight nerfs for specific units.

USF are fine, so are Soviets. Wehrmacht only struggles ATM because of overpriced teching.

Fix teching for vanilla factions, re-design OKW, fix the call-in meta and then relic can look for OP/UP units and change what needs to be changed.

YES! BUT that's only possible if you adjust vanilla factions' teching to bring it more in line with the new WFA.

Soviet fuel cost for T3/T4 should be lowered, for example, once you've built t3 or t4, the other tier costs 50% less.

Wehrmacht teching should be like this: cheap BPs, more expensive buildings.

Example: 100MP + 15FU for every BP, 140MP + 35FU (T2), 140MP + 50FU (T3) and 140MP + 65FU for T4.

Heavy call-ins (10CPs and above) should have a limit of 2 + a fuel penalty of 50% once you have built a second one.

T34/85 should have a limit of 4 because they're no heavy tanks (obviously). KV-1s should probably have a limit as well.


Why the fuel penalty? Well, if someone decides to go for a second heavy instead of teching up and getting some stock units as support, he should pay the price: reduced fuel income to make it harder to replace lost heavies.

I don't see any reason why a limitation for certain tanks couldn't be done. A limit for some heavy tanks together with a tech overhaul for vanilla factions would really refresh the current meta IMO.

Fluctuating between 3 and 5? That's not possible. It may be that you switched between ammo and fuel cache.

OKW gets 2 fuel, all other factions get 3. OKW gets 4 ammo, all other factions get 5.

1. Very nice cast - entertaining match
2. Luchs is quite easy to pronounce: just say "looks"
3. Dat RNG

...How?

The Jackson already has horrible amounts of over-penetration for all of Ost T3 and most OKW vehicles.

Buffing the long range pen will hurt heavy tanks more, sure. But when you're never bouncing on a PzIV or StuG anyway, it's going to made nada difference to the PzIV/Jackson combat outcome.

When you only bounce 1 in 100 shots to begin with (never mind if you pop your special super rounds), the functional increase in average damage per shot is utterly trivial against medium tanks.

It's like saying that buffing Jagdtiger pen would hurt the t-70, it's not going to even begin to matter...

OK, let me say it this way: buffing its pen without reducing damage will make it more viable vs heavier armor, sure, but it won't change the fact that OST T3 is useless, T4 is overpriced and OST will still have to rely on heavy call-ins.

Horrible amounts of over-penetration only applies to the StuG and Ostwind, the PZIV has 180 armor but it doesn't really matter.

Every stock TD (SU-85, JPIV) has good penetration but 160 damage. Why does the Jackson have to be the exception? Good penetration (after proposed buffs), 240 damage and a turret.

I totally support a pen buff, but at the cost of damage otherwise it would simply be too strong.