Profile of Myself

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 677

General Information


Thread: Running over troops6 Jan 2016, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 11:35 AMAustralian Magic Why don't you say to Jesulin that only retards can be pushed back to base and dive bombed? I am not the one using L2P as an argument you are, and its pretty poor one. Crushing is a real and not a L2P. The fact is that little consideration has been made on balancing crush humans and thus: Different tanks are easier or harder to crush humans and the difference is not based on the units role or cost or some other balance factor but simply in mobility... Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 11:27 AMKatitof He is a human player, not some kind of micro and awareness god. Exactly and thus L2P is not a valid argument. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Running over troops6 Jan 2016, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 10:28 AMAustralian Magic Another thread? Just L2P. Mines, snares, micro, at guns etc etc etc. Why don't you say that to helpinghans who in the finals lost multiplies entities to Cromwell crash, almost had a squad wipe and was constantly push of the field because of Cromwell crash. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications5 Jan 2016, 11:49 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 22:20 PMPutinist On topic: Ignoring the terminological war in this thread, I don't agree with OP - fiddling with assault guns effectiveness against static positions would possibly require a chain of balance changes, especially with brit emplacements which are troublesome already. I don't have too much confidence with Relic's work when trying to balance the game, so creating problems by addressing an non balance - issue doesn't sound good to me. Also, assault guns are effective enough vs most static positions already imo. My suggestions on what changes imo can be made that will have little impact in overall balance can be found in page 3: Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 11:56 AMMyself One could add some damage modifier similar to Avre against structures. One could also make it veterancy related: for instance Brumbar vet 1 ability "Bunker Busting Barrage" could have damage bonus or even bypass some of the "brace" damage reduction. For instance instead of 75% damage reduction the reduction could be lower down to 50%. A similar change could be made to the Sturm Tiger (S.T.) also by adding similar affect in vet 1 since the vet 1 S.T. is quiet useless. Similar change could be made to other assault guns like the Dozer, Kv-2 indirect, ISU-152 giving some anti-structure barrage abilities (where not available) or some structure damage modifiers with veterancy. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications5 Jan 2016, 11:44 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 23:52 PMGenObi You two fellows are correct,... /Let it die I pleasantly surprised that you have proven me wrong and you can actually admit a mistake. But what is is important here is not an error in some formula,(we all make mistakes) but your nonconstructive provoking approach that turned what should had been a debate on balance issue into knowledge competition... What you need to contemplate is how would you react if someone now turned his signature to: At no point is accuracy a factor in DPS calculation... -Gen0bi,Jan 2016 Nothing further to add. Matter is closed for me.... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 21:39 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 21:34 PMGenObi That's the beautiful part of stats and mathematical Fourmals they are not subjective to people's own views...no matter how wrong they are. Your beyond salvation...PLS never question another person knowledge of the game...Just think about it a bullet that does not hit a target will make 0 damage.... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 21:31 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 21:25 PMGenObi FORMULA for DPS calculation Damage / (Activation Time + Recharge) = Damage per Second Damage equals the unit base damage, activation time is the "ready aim stats" and the key to it all,+ recharge or in other words RELOAD At no point is accuracy a factor in DPS calculation therefore you are WRONG. Your opinion of accuracy is important to DPS just that a opinion and unquestionably wrong at that. I will not even attempt to convince you that completely wrong. You can debate this issue with: Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2016, 01:40 AMelchino7 Offtopic: accuracy is leagues ahead been better than reload and cooldown. Accuracy translates directly into DPS increase while reload/cooldown is around 1/4 as effective as accuracy is. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 20:51 PMGenObi I have have already said why reload is important,... You still did not answer the question "in your opinion is in-game reload better than accuracy for small arms fire?" and in your original post did not claim that reload is important, you actually claimed that is the more important than others. Your attitude simply illustrates that you are incapable of acknowledging when you have made a mistake (and you have done in at least 3 different occasions) and thus there is little point in debating with you anything for long... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 20:25 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 20:06 PMGenObi "Do fortifications exist In coh2", the answer is no... Gen0bi feel free to debate the issue with Plaguer who believe that there are fortification in COH2. Your opinion that fortification do not exist in COH2 is noted...no reason to go back to it again... By the way, in your opinion is in-game reload better than accuracy for small arms fire? (I am still waiting for an answer) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 19:30 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 18:44 PMPlaguer Maybe read that post again Since you agree that fortification in COH2 exist and you simply do not find my arguments valid, PLS feel free to respond to anyone questioning the existence of fortification in COH2, you can start with katitof and Gen0bi...your superior arguments will convince them. Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 17:35 PMPlaguer No logic Read and understand what katitof wrote and why what he writes is not "valid": He arbitrary translated the sentence "effective against infantry and buildings" (structures) to "clear buildings" (garrison), in order to continue arguing that emplacements do not exist in COH2. In the end of the day it is not my logic the topic of the thread and since you agree with my there is little reason to question my logic...I have made suggestions on assault guns and fortification so pls stay on topic. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 18:08 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 17:35 PMPlaguer The thing about making these kind of units be more powerful against structures would force them to be nerfed against infantry overall, so they wouldn't just shred all the emplacements and infantry in seconds, simple balance stuff. Imo it is not "simple balance stuff"...Many of these units like KV-2, Brumbar, Dozer are hardly cost efficient and adding utility to them would not make them OP it would simply make more commonly used. Most of these units also have a rather low ROF so they can not actually "shred" infantry. They are also rather bad against moving targets including moving infantries. On the other hand allot of these units can be hard countered by tanks, so I see now reason why buffing their performance vs structures will upset balance in anyway... Your opinion that fortification do not exist in COH2 is noted...no reason to go back to it again... In: COH2 Gameplay