Profile of Zansibar

Avatar Area

Offline Sweden
Posts: 158 | Subs: 2

General Information
Last Visit Time: 14 Jul 2021, 21:24 PM
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVPSS9k6ASbrDZcoSIhKT0g
Steam: 76561198020781963
Residence:

Sweden
Nationality:

Sweden
Game Name: Zansibar

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 21:14 PM To the people saying that seeing M26s often in this game wouldnt be authentic. The US only came across the Tiger I on 3 confirmed accounts in the ETO, the Pershing engaged German armour in more cases than that. I can qoute most of the engagements from the M26 book by Zaloga if anyone wants it. If the initial is your opinion then you may as well consider the removal of Tiger Is and Jagdtigers ingame. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 21:11 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 20:56 PMButcher A vehicle that was deployed almost two years later. Doesnt matter at all, they came across each other. The Shermans were deployed almost 3 years before the Tiger II, does that mean we should have no Tiger IIs ingame or something? In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 20:53 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 14:45 PMJohnnyB You allied fanboys are allways making me laugh. I can't wait to see your disappointment when your precious little Pershing will be not even of Tiger's caliber not to mention IS2. So no, "axis fanboys" are not fearing Pershing. Panther will dispose of it with no truble at all. And all that axis fanboys will do then, is laugh of your tears. Are you kidding? The 90mm M3 is better than the 88mm L/56 and the Pershing has better armor. 100mm at 30 degrees of sloping vs 100mm at 10 degrees which is basically almost flat armor. The Pershing is better than the Tiger I and can deal with one without any issues at any range. Oh and the Panther you say? Too bad that the Pershing with the 90mm M3 can make short work of it too at most ranges http://i.imgur.com/Xt23Z66.png 90mm M3 with M82 APCBC penetrates 120mm of armor at 30 degrees at 457m Source: range.https://sc-cdn.scaleengine.net/i/b4b8b21f15bf00f8893f157caea2e5831.png The 88mm L/56 with PzGr 39 penetrates 120mm at 100m and 110mm at 500m. Source: http://i.imgur.com/LaVvuIA.jpg The T30E16 HVAP (APCR) on the 90mm M3 also wipes the floor with the PzGr 40 APCR. In: Lobby
Thread: T0 AT Idea for USF1 Oct 2014, 13:42 PM 37mm M3 WC51 37mm gun carriage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: what grinds your gears ?1 Oct 2014, 10:49 AM The communities attitude towards the community. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 13:40 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 13:13 PMCardboard Tank Okay, okay: Next on the (german) to do list: Jagdpanther - current Panther characteristics + Elefant gun. Have fun with that balanced game. I can only guess how big the uproar would be. A semi mobile but significantly weaker chassis.. Sure ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ >implying that you need it tho This was about the need of a TD that can compete with said vehicles, not something to add on "just because". In: Lobby
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 12:53 PM This game is supposedly competitive now as well and thus it would make even more sense tom implement such vehicles. In: Lobby
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 12:05 PMkiriL A counter to Kubel??How can you say such blasphemy????....Use 8 Conscripts squads and watch Kubels burn....oh and adapt,L2P ftw Ikr, how dare Allies ask for more versiltilty!? We have AT capable of killing the heaviest allied armor at our HQ (Panzerwerfer 43), but you cant have anything near that In: Lobby
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 12:12 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 11:51 AMCardboard Tank 1. I don´t have OKW and I´m not planning to buy it. Not every player can build King Tigers and Jagdtigers. Nobody should be forced to buy it. True, but its still a part of the game. 2. A unit competing with JTs would lead to the gameplay of the last big patch: Elefant vs ISU, only with Su-100s and JTs. Dont forget the KT. 3. Why would the Jagdpanzer IV which is the most similar vehicle in the game to a SU-100 get 60 range and the SU-100 70 range? (The difference between both vehicles is marginal and the 75mm had a flatter trajectory.) That 100mm gun have a helluva lot more mass per shell than a 75mm mind you, and this is a game that plays out on maps that arent larger than about 1000x1000m while we all know that tank combat could happen significantly further than that, taking in IRL logic in this case about a game doesnt work. 4. Multiplayer games: ISU-152 + SU-100 = Broken. Germans migth get the JT but can´t wipe infantry with one shot. In 1v1s an OKW player can get out both a JT and a KT since one is commander bound and the other one is a standard unit, meanwhile a Soviet player could only choose between the SU-100 (Stronger AT) or an ISU-152 (Assault gun with decent AT capabilities) since both would be commander bound, its more broken if you look at the OKW side tbh, Wehrmacht and Soviets would be quite fair in those regards tho. 5. In the early stages of the game the SU-85 was hella OP. Now Imagine the chassis with more damage and range. For the same reason a Jagdpanther isn´t needed ingame either. Its a commander bound call in, kinda like an elephant but it would probably have worse armor, and firerate but higher damage and a bit more mobility. Comparing it with an SU-85 doesnt make sense since as i said time and time again it would be a commander bound call in and not a standard tank, just like the Elephant. 6. Super range tanks in the game are always slow, making them somewhat balanced. In: Lobby
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 11:28 AMCardboard Tank It was kinda obvious that we were referring to the games multiplayer and the time it´s set in. Ok ok. Now give me a good arguement to why Soviets should not have a competitive AT platform capable of competeing to a certain degree with JTs and KTs. Because they didnt have such armor? Well the SU-100 saw service as you might have noticed. Or is it just that you dont wanna to need to have a little challenge? In: Lobby