Profile of somenbjorn

Disclaimer not disagreeing with anyone. NDA is often done excecuted wrong, this being the case I just hope to explain WHY companies in general do it.

Companies are often secretive about the wrong things. (and sometimes not secretive enough about the right things.)

In marketing it is an effort for the marketing team to keep full control of how the product is portrayed and at what time. Makes it easier to make strategies and study the success of marketing.
As such, new features, sales and campaigns are the most protected things ever.

Even if it is a standard reply, that doesn't mean nothing takes place internally. A letter, signed by as many clanleaders as possible will cause a stir.

It will be discussed internally if enough people sign it, if only one or two does it, maybe just over the coffee machine. But if enough people sign it I bet you there will be a serious internal discussion about it.

To Relic I say: We don't dislike you (atleast I don't ) we do like your product, thats why we care so much, and I understand you work hard to make it the best.
I also know gamers as a group are nigh impossible to please.
We are just wanting to get our feedback to you in a good and constructive way so we can improve this game that we like even more.

Don't bully the Suchka! A little weak and blows up alot but it does the best it can!
Jokes aside Im not suggesting you 'spam' any type of unit. But a wall of fire coming from several of the earlier stated units will knock out any tank. However often they will just retreat because hey engage warp drive and smoke away. Still they cannot push.
Thats until they snipe your TDs with Jagdlol and Elephant.

Changing the ISU to an AI roll, it can be the basis for a combined armoured force. Knocking out infantry while the other units can be focused more on AT. Im just saying hopefully, this will not have an all too adverse effect on 1v1.
But sure even with that you also might need to bring up the other AT capabilites of the allies to fill that gap. I was hoping however that this gap could be closed by a change to the abilites and attributes of the heavy german TDs.


@NinjaWJ: Agreed. I wrote about that a while back, right now any allied TD force are in danger of being picked apart by blob of shrecks, running up fireing one round and then pulling back again. Demos can guard against that for a while.
Soviet infantry shouldn't be dissmissed outright in such situations, but yes they aren't that effective dmg dealers. Wouldnt however an ISU Anti-inf only ISU convering the main TD force atleast help with that?


@Snipester I think it has been established in this thread a long time ago that we have to find a way to make sure any balance change focused on teamgames doesn't effect 1v1.

Against heavy german tanks? No other nobrainer. But Zis-3, SU-85, SU-76, T-34/85, IS-2 all work well. Just not on their own. Numbers comrades.

@dek0y, you are right, they don't. But give one bullshit superunit to one-side the other side gets one I guess.

In my opinion they should all go.

Just nerf the ISU to deal mostly with infantry again. And Elephant and Jagd can be nerfed to reasonable levels.

Axis needs them for fear allies might go ISU, if you just remove the great AT power of the ISU there won't be any unbalance if the Jagd and elephant goes down a notch. (or 5).

Allies have enough AT without ISU anyhow.