Bring KV-2 CP count down by 1

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 1276

Hi friends, CoH 2 Ded game and all but I would like to suggest a quick change on something thats been bugging me for awhile. Its the dang KV2!
Now we all know the kv2 is a Meme and is hardly ever played in 1v1s outside of a barton match but that got me thinking as to why?

The CP count as it stands is probably the highest heavy armor tank of its class, getting to the 14 CP takes ages and often times wont happen until you are either off the map or the game is simply over.
As such we should let this unit come into the fray a little earlier, a 13 CP count KV2 would do wonders.
The KV-2 as its stands already has a lot of drawbacks and would only open up the window for this unit be played or utilized.

TLDR: Bring KV-2 CP count to 13 (similar to is-2, tiger)

Posts: 284 | Subs: 1

+1
it will be free vet if call it without proper supports.

Posts: 1216

I think it comes soon enough. The problem I see is that it's not worth the cost given what it is and how vulnerable to attacks it can be.

In my opinion, bringing it down might make it come sooner, but not any more relevant or useful.

Posts: 1486

cps are not a factor in late game.

Playercard of 2v2 imbecils

1v1: None	2v2: None	3v3: None	4v4: None
1v1: None	2v2: None	3v3: None	4v4: None
1v1: P	2v2: 467	3v3: None	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: None	4v4: P

SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1276

29 Apr 2017, 07:49 AMaaa

cps are not a factor in late game.

That comment makes no sense. You have to get to "late game" at some point. Whats a is2, tiger, jt, pershing?
The KV2 should be standardized with its cp requirement relative to other vehicles of its class.

Its such a simple argument yet you cant just agree lol.

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

I think KV-2 should be on 12 - CP, closest units are Stormtigr and AVRE - 12/11 CP

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1

Im Kv-2 should have:
1) lower CP
2) minimum range removed
3) vision penalty reduced or removed
4) target size penalty on switching modes removed

5) would even consider increasing limit to 2.

For the Doctrine I would consider bringing soviet industry back and allowing T4 to built without T3 allowing only t34 to build for increased price of 100 fuel until T3 was up.

Or having some bonuses for T34 if all building where built.