Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
). And with such build and doctrine we (2v2) were able to win smoothly agasint top 50 Axis AT many times.
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
You'd be amazed how funny this doctrine is (despite being shit
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Those are kinda contradictory statements...
)
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Nope. Royal arty is fun to play but it's shit.
OST Storm doctrine is really fun to play but it's not impressive.
NKVD is shit but again, its fun to use it.
Or maybe this way.
DSHK and mines are awesome. 120, M42 and tank traps are close to being useless (although I manage to get vet3 M42 almost always and in this particular replay it dealt more damage than SU85
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I more meant saying it's shit and while saying its use smoothly won top 50 AT matches.
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Like I said. Double DSHK and mines can do wonders despite other 3 abilities are not that useful.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 587
Impact damage is same...
Oh, wait there is no impact damage on Molotov.
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
Posts: 17891 | Subs: 8
No proof whatsoever for this, but people still believe...
As i said, there is impact damage on the molotov.
It's the same as incen nade (both 10).
You can find the damage of the molotov at weapon\soviet\flame_throwers\grenade\molotov_cocktail_weapon_mp in the attribute editor (tho you don't strike me as the type capable of finding his way to the stats...)
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 48
Soviets can be good enougth to play against other factions specially in 1vs1 if you play in a really specific way and thats the problem, they have the biggest amout of useles units, vet abilities, commanders. and in some cases they are straigth worst, like in air abilities with the suply drops or the il2 strafes, or the ninja buf of the stuka.
Dont agree? lets see.
Flares, button, m42, kv1, kv2, shermanC (comes at cp10!), cap territory, all tier1, tier 4 not prepared for late game, hit the dirt, il2 atack and specially il2 single strafe, rapid conscripation, b4, the balanced katyusha (so balanced that its worst than every single roket artillery in the game) not upgradeable conscripts, granade side costs, ultra long animations for granades and penal charges.
And those are the worst ofenders a lot of units and abilities are in need of small adjustments.
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Soviets can be good enougth to play against other factions specially in 1vs1 if you play in a really specific way and thats the problem, they have the biggest amout of useles units, vet abilities, commanders. and in some cases they are strigth worst, like in air abilities with the suply drops or the il2 strafes, or the ninja buf of the stuka.
Dont agree? lets see.
Flares, button, m42, kv1, kv2, shermanC (comes at cp10!), cap territory, all tier1, tier 4 not prepared for late game, hit the dirt, il2 atack and specially il2 single strafe, rapid conscripation, b4, the balanced katyusha (so balanced that its worst than every single roket artillery in the game) not upgradeable conscripts, granade side costs, ultra long animations for granades and penal charges.
And those are the worst ofenders a lot of units and abilities are in need of small adjustments.
Posts: 670
Always want to ask -Why M4C? In soviet documents it's called or M4 Средний (Translated M4 Medium) or like in US army (M4A2, M4A2 (76) W and etc.).
C for Советский (Soviet in Russian) or Cheap or something else?
P.S. Sorry for little offtopic, i don't want to make another thread about incorrect names of USSR tanks in game.
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
Posts: 673
Google says it's lend lease designation.
Also penals do not need to have at grenades. Why so many people confuse them with mainline infantry I don't know
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I always see the same shit, it's like Soviet was designed to be cheese or spam or bacon or however you wanna name it.
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Google says it's lend lease designation.
Also penals do not need to have at grenades. Why so many people confuse them with mainline infantry I don't know
Posts: 3293
) though i don't know if they will ever even see the light of day im going to try damnit! 
anyways lets try and keep it civil here guys adding flames to fire only makes it a bigger fire there is this thing called the report button for a reason. 
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
Posts: 161
Just like 10CPs Command Panther
Posts: 484
Posts: 61
But penals should have AT anyway. T1 right now stays without AT at all. And that's bad for early soviet.
I only can suggest to give them upgrade with "PTRS packs". With them T1 will become more popular and Penals won't be "little better copy of cons with flamers and BIGBADABOOMBA".
Posts: 609
Recently I have used defensive tactics.
Engis, Sniper, Cons, Cons, DHSK, M42, DSHK into T70 and T34/76 or SU85 and Katy.
You'd be amazed how funny this doctrine is (despite being shit
Mark that I make engis as a first unit beciase double engis are essential for Anti-Personel mines spam.
Here is one example.
 |
|
|
51 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
122 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
