Why no MG Upgrade for the Pershing?
6 Nov 2015, 02:43 AM
#1
Posts: 372
Not a complaint, just wondering as to the reasoning behind it considering even the expensive US .50 cal pintle mounted MG's don't do much.
6 Nov 2015, 03:21 AM
#2
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
USF is overpowered enough already.
6 Nov 2015, 03:22 AM
#3
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
The idea I believe is that the pershing has good enough AI with its main cannon, and that the vet 2 ability makes use of the hatch to throw grenades.
6 Nov 2015, 05:31 AM
#4
Posts: 4928
Because the Pershing didn't have a turret MG. The closest it had was a rear-mounted M2, but this required the TC to stand on the engine bay to use. Obviously the turret can not turn while this MG is being used.


6 Nov 2015, 05:33 AM
#5
Posts: 1124
its main cannon AI is perfect as is....
PAGES (1)

1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
|
|
|
1108 | ||
|
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.817139.855+5
- 2.47970.872+3
- 3.1109398.736-1
- 4.420217.659-1
- 5.377196.658+2
- 6.432301.589+1
- 7.11730.796+4
- 8.1347748.643+1
- 9.12957.694+9
- 10.341122.737+2
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
17
Download
2871
Board Info
711 users are online:
711 guests
1 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
5 posts in the last month
2 posts in the last week
5 posts in the last month
Registered members: 67167
Welcome our newest member, kp88onl
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
Welcome our newest member, kp88onl
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM





