I disagree. I think it's an example of a good asymmetrical balance.
If you go T1 you aren't *denied* AT guns. You're basically gambling that you can beat out the enemy with superior firepower and inferior numbers. You give up a fast. AT gun and in return you get AT infantry that can hold their own against LVs. And then from there you supplement those troops with tanks that pick up the slack in AT and AI.
OR if you realize that you're not going to ne able to do that you still get the option to build T2 and get an AT gun.
That's a 1v1 scenario. In other game modes, sovs that go penal find their one AT unit facing early p4's with no AT gun support
 
	
 
			 
			
 
  
  
 
 
										 
									

 
  
						 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
						 
						 
						 
						 
						 Relic Entertainment
						 Relic Entertainment
					 cblanco ★
									cblanco ★								 보드카 중대
									보드카 중대								 VonManteuffel
									VonManteuffel								 Heartless Jäger
									Heartless Jäger								 
											 
								