Very intense 2v2 game on Rails and Metal.
Definitely down to the wire!
Featuring:
*Good early game allied aggression.
*Command P4 doing work.
*Ostheer T3 holding the line.
*Many dead Volks.
*A sea of T34/85s and Is-2s
*Last but not least, a KT.
GGWP to our opponents.
Lemon&Ciez - Super Intense 2v2
by
CieZ
21st April 2015, 19:43 PM
-
[NS] T?Me
-
M4D |-Sebuj
Rails and Metal (4)
-
L E M O N ?
-
RtN.CieZ
- [00:38:21] [NS] T?Me:
- [00:38:22] [NS] T?Me:
- [00:38:31] L E M O N ?:
- [00:38:38] [NS] T?Me:
- [00:38:43] [NS] T?Me:
21 Apr 2015, 19:43 PM
#1
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
21 Apr 2015, 20:17 PM
#2
Posts: 366
mixed axis winning on rails and metal is not very surprising.
We choose our joys and sorrows long before we experience them
21 Apr 2015, 20:37 PM
#3
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
PLZ god nerf pak40 
anyways, gg wp
anyways, gg wp
 | Playercard of TüMe | |||||||||||||||||||
|
21 Apr 2015, 21:21 PM
#4
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
mixed axis winning on rails and metal is not very surprising.
Doesn't prevent it from being a good game...
22 Apr 2015, 01:54 AM
#5
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Should had salvage those Panthers. The KT, or even the P2, arriving earlier would had give you guys an easier game.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
22 Apr 2015, 01:58 AM
#6
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
ciez back? next patch gonna be gud?
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
22 Apr 2015, 07:38 AM
#7
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
PLZ god nerf pak40
anyways, gg wp
Not sure if sarcasm or sincere considering your in-game chat.
22 Apr 2015, 10:18 AM
#8
Posts: 393
Both sides at times played rather poorly, nice comeback in the mid game by the soviets though.
sig by tricky 
22 Apr 2015, 11:06 AM
#9
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Not sure if sarcasm or sincere considering your in-game chat.
Not sarcasm
its just so stupid that with pak40 wall u dont even need frekin commander for ostheer at late game. | Playercard of TüMe | |||||||||||||||||||
|
22 Apr 2015, 14:49 PM
#10
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
ciez back? next patch gonna be gud?
#NDA lol
This parch is good though. Probably the best balance we've had.
22 Apr 2015, 16:09 PM
#11
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Not sarcasm
Isn't the whole call- in meta and Cons to IS2 stupid? If the PAK is nerfed, Ostheer can't deal with IS2s. Don't wanna argue balance here but at the current state PAK40 is the most viable option.
22 Apr 2015, 17:47 PM
#12
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Isn't the whole call- in meta and Cons to IS2 stupid? If the PAK is nerfed, Ostheer can't deal with IS2s. Don't wanna argue balance here but at the current state PAK40 is the most viable option.
In fact ( idont wanna argue either) goin for gren spam and call in tiger , seems more legit. how soviet can deal with tiger without Zis and ostheer cant IS2, bcoz too op ? there is less cheesy option, goin for t4 and panthers, instead of couple panzers and pak wall.
You know, there is somethings that are just cheesy (for example spam pak40), just A command ur pak blob and there is nooo point which commander you have. it doesnt matter if its infantry support, call in tank, artillery. okay if katysha was buffrd , just to controll that pak wall, then its cool to me that enemy have 10 paks if he likes.
I dont see lemon breaking meta when he has 4 paks. bcoz its pak
| Playercard of TüMe | |||||||||||||||||||
|
22 Apr 2015, 17:53 PM
#13
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
In fact ( idont wanna argue either) goin for gren spam and call in tiger , seems more legit. how soviet can deal with tiger without Zis and ostheer cant IS2, bcoz too op ? there is less cheesy option, goin for t4 and panthers, instead of couple panzers and pak wall.
You know, there is somethings that are just cheesy (for example spam pak40), just A command ur pak blob and there is nooo point which commander you have. it doesnt matter if its infantry support, call in tank, artillery. okay if katysha was buffrd , just to controll that pak wall, then its cool to me that enemy have 10 paks if he likes.
I dont see lemon breaking meta when he has 4 paks. bcoz its pak
Well game is pretty much based on cheese these days, and each player chooses the the best cost efficient way to win, Sovs do spam to call in, Ost uses PAK spam, USF spams rifles to jax, and OKW spams volks then KT. Cheese versus cheese I guess.
And about the meta, when I read the title I thought it's gonna be like P4 spam, like 4 P4s and shit, but yea it was PAK spam
The game was close though, GG and WP to all 4 of you. looking forward to future replays.
22 Apr 2015, 19:46 PM
#14
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
In fact ( idont wanna argue either) goin for gren spam and call in tiger , seems more legit. how soviet can deal with tiger without Zis and ostheer cant IS2, bcoz too op ? there is less cheesy option, goin for t4 and panthers, instead of couple panzers and pak wall.
You know, there is somethings that are just cheesy (for example spam pak40), just A command ur pak blob and there is nooo point which commander you have. it doesnt matter if its infantry support, call in tank, artillery. okay if katysha was buffrd , just to controll that pak wall, then its cool to me that enemy have 10 paks if he likes.
I dont see lemon breaking meta when he has 4 paks. bcoz its pak
I don't remember the last time I've seen a p4 command tank in a 2v2 and even normal p4s are a rarity. When was the last time any ost player other than lemon opened double mg into double flamer pios?
If he had spammed Panthers or tigers wouldn't you just complain about that instead? Or if he went elefant would you cry about the ele being uncounterable for soviet?
Sure felt like a different game on lemons part than the normal lmg gren blob into stug e into tigers that most people do these days. Feels like you're fishing for stuff to complain about honestly.
22 Apr 2015, 19:48 PM
#15
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Well game is pretty much based on cheese these days, and each player chooses the the best cost efficient way to win, Sovs do spam to call in, Ost uses PAK spam, USF spams rifles to jax, and OKW spams volks then KT. Cheese versus cheese I guess.
And about the meta, when I read the title I thought it's gonna be like P4 spam, like 4 P4s and shit, but yea it was PAK spam
The game was close though, GG and WP to all 4 of you. looking forward to future replays.
Yes this was very good game in the end. But im not crying anythig about elephant, its easier to counter than pak wall
@Ciez | Playercard of TüMe | |||||||||||||||||||
|
22 Apr 2015, 21:58 PM
#16
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
You beat paks by using katyushas and timing pushes in conjunction with barrages.
22 Apr 2015, 22:09 PM
#17
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Yea, the soviets got too caught up in spamming tanks to remember they can tech to things. Another Katy instead of the 2nd IS2 would have been much better. With the abundance of indirect fire Allies have, PAK spam should be the least of your worries.
23 Apr 2015, 06:14 AM
#18
Posts: 124
Yea, the soviets got too caught up in spamming tanks to remember they can tech to things. Another Katy instead of the 2nd IS2 would have been much better. With the abundance of indirect fire Allies have, PAK spam should be the least of your worries.
Actually even the katy he had was the most useless katy i ve ever seen. Instead of firing at OKW t2 when all the inf retreated he was firing at p4s. Seriously... its a 2v2 its meant to be a teamgame
23 Apr 2015, 11:18 AM
#19
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Actually even the katy he had was the most useless katy i ve ever seen. Instead of firing at OKW t2 when all the inf retreated he was firing at p4s. Seriously... its a 2v2 its meant to be a teamgame
Whoa ! did u see where dat t2 building was ? so far that i barely could shoot it at max range, which is same as useless. im not map hacking so sometimes its hard to say where did katy hit, mainly i tried to hit on paks, if it went on pivs then it went, but that wasnt my meaning LOL. are you being stupid here or what ?
| Playercard of TüMe | |||||||||||||||||||
|
23 Apr 2015, 15:33 PM
#20
Posts: 32
Shut yer mouth Tüme!! GG, was rather poor play on both sides imo, stupid rushes etc.
GG, was rather poor play on both sides imo, stupid rushes etc.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
37 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
90 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29144.869+1
- 4.275110.714+13
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.249150.624+10
- 7.19265.747+5
- 8.14138.788+16
- 9.18878.707+2
- 10.669423.613+5
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
736
Board Info
479 users are online:
1 member and 478 guests
NorthWeapon
NorthWeapon
0 post in the last 24h
32 posts in the last week
142 posts in the last month
32 posts in the last week
142 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44954
Welcome our newest member, Mtbgbans
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mtbgbans
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM