I would like to know what is your point of view to this subject.
1. B-4 or ML-20
2. B-4 doctrine or ML-20 doctrines?
I find ML-20 easier to vet (4 shells per barrage).
It comes with Guards (I prefer them over Shocks)
FAB-50.
If I go for Ml-20, I choose T34/76 as my main AT power. Why? Because I can ram or block (and sacrafice 1 T34/76) heavy target, then use direct ML-20 shot + Fab-50. None tank will survive such combo. It has nice rotation speed, punish for blobs.
B-4 is hard to vet. You have to be lucky to hit something, but since vet and direct shot it's a monster.
However it has very slow rotation, comes with KV-1 so I will not be able to spam T34/76. Rather use KV-1 as damage sponge for SU-85 so I lose mid-game advantage which T34/76 provides me.
What is your opinion? B-4 is better than ML-20?
Counter-attack doctrine is better or worse when compare to ML-20 doctrines?
Livestreams
|
|
|
72 | ||
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.817139.855+5
- 2.47970.872+3
- 3.1093393.736+2
- 4.420217.659-1
- 5.11730.796+4
- 6.377196.658+2
- 7.338121.736+6
- 8.424299.586-4
- 9.12957.694+9
- 10.1346748.643-4
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
17
Download
2871
Board Info
539 users are online:
1 member and 538 guests
profilehatenxq
profilehatenxq
0 post in the last 24h
1 post in the last week
5 posts in the last month
1 post in the last week
5 posts in the last month
Registered members: 66987
Welcome our newest member, profilehatenxq
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
Welcome our newest member, profilehatenxq
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM

TAB Australian Magic