I would like to know what is your point of view to this subject.
1. B-4 or ML-20
2. B-4 doctrine or ML-20 doctrines?
I find ML-20 easier to vet (4 shells per barrage).
It comes with Guards (I prefer them over Shocks)
FAB-50.
If I go for Ml-20, I choose T34/76 as my main AT power. Why? Because I can ram or block (and sacrafice 1 T34/76) heavy target, then use direct ML-20 shot + Fab-50. None tank will survive such combo. It has nice rotation speed, punish for blobs.
B-4 is hard to vet. You have to be lucky to hit something, but since vet and direct shot it's a monster.
However it has very slow rotation, comes with KV-1 so I will not be able to spam T34/76. Rather use KV-1 as damage sponge for SU-85 so I lose mid-game advantage which T34/76 provides me.
What is your opinion? B-4 is better than ML-20?
Counter-attack doctrine is better or worse when compare to ML-20 doctrines?
Livestreams
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.817140.854-1
- 2.48170.873+5
- 3.1122398.738+13
- 4.449227.664+4
- 5.553350.612+3
- 6.23159.797+8
- 7.1384761.645+6
- 8.348124.737+2
- 9.430305.585+1
- 10.11830.797+5
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
17
Download
3125
Board Info
547 users are online:
547 guests
0 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
9 posts in the last month
4 posts in the last week
9 posts in the last month
Registered members: 68685
Welcome our newest member, taixiuonline88comde
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
Welcome our newest member, taixiuonline88comde
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM

TAB Australian Magic