Profile of braciszek

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2053

General Information
Steam: 76561198027972381


Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 18:43 PMBurts Well, once non doctrinal soviet vehicles aren't metal coffins, then i am fine with mark target increasing penetration instead of damage. However, until soviet non doctrinal vehicles are unable to do anything, it must stay as it is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:09 PM Mark target is as OP as the unit its intended to pawn. Make the targets its supposed to mark easier to deal with, and Mark Target could vanish altogether. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:04 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 18:02 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ Making you be down a tank on a critical engagement is not a counter, Especially after you shot the plane down. What? ... So a counter is a light switch that turns mark target off when you want it to go away? It isnt permanent, so waiting for something to go away indefinitely IS a way to deal with it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:00 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 17:56 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ The only problem is 0 counterplay nothing you can do can prevent it or stop it. Mark target immediately stops your tanks, making them immobile and perfect targets. (Alternatively, drive back to the base and sacrifice a tank for a small duration in trade for wasted munitions) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 17:49 PM So... Its okay for German stuff to do what it wants because it costs so much... But proper Allied investments of the same magnitude shouldn't be rewarding... Can we remove Allies please? Germans on Germans? I bet the game would be super balanced then because of logic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About the B-413 Nov 2014, 14:45 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 14:37 PMAustralian Magic Remember that ISU nerf is coming I heard Relic is introducing random Axis mirror matches into matchmaking MVGame In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 13 Nov 2014, 14:38 PM Sturmpios should have had the schrecks, not the volks... Would fix a dozen problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About the B-413 Nov 2014, 14:32 PM Let them nerf B4. Even more ISU usage will happen and everyone will wish they used something else when the alternatives get nerfed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you think Grenadier LMG too strong?13 Nov 2014, 14:26 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 10:48 AMCasTroy Unfortunately you are so right man! It is getting boring.. Back to topic: I think Grens with LMGs are fine. You can easily deal with them playing as US. Playing as Soviets it is a little pain in the ass in the early game if you counter them with conscripts without molotovs. But in mid and late game there are so many Soviet counters that Grens will drop like flies. So nerfing LMG? I don´t see any reasons for this intention. Edit: I forgot to mention the high costs of 90 Mun if Ostheer player wants to equip a single Grensquad with LMGs. Its 60 muni. In: Lobby
Thread: Theater of War / Mod: Warsaw Ghetto Uprising? 13 Nov 2014, 02:20 AM Minus the Ghetto part: Could be cool. It could include: Stealth missions. Last stands. Liberation of areas and peoples. Capturing of German equipment. And finally, the unavoidable defeat from lack of help. In: Lobby