Profile of Capacity_gear

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 87

General Information


Thread: [OCF] R2 Capacity_gear vs Kieran Wood 96 - Match 37220 Sep 2015, 16:18 PM Capacity_gear Won 122 - 70 Vp's In: Replays
Thread: Some thoughts on Sep 17th patch.17 Sep 2015, 13:02 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 12:58 PMOuTLaWSTaR +1 for thinking outside the box. That'd be cool if they could limit the vicinity marker (to ensure noone wheels it to a base...), and you could retreat the so called artillery back to back or transport cargo loads. Wait,.. is someone suggesting trains?!?!?! +1 for trains, don't care why or what for,. just trains In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Operation Charlie Fox sign-ups thread17 Sep 2015, 11:39 AM Steam Alias: Capacity_gear Steam ID#: 76561198020353935 (hoping to last long enough to play enough games to acquire a 1v1 ranking as ive played under 10 matches on all #believe #nevergonnahappen #youwishnoob) In: Operation Charlie Fox
Thread: Should Sov and Ost have Forward Retreat Points? 17 Sep 2015, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 10:26 AMMr. Someguy USF can reinforce off their Half-Track, it's just shitty and doctrinal and needs buffed, but they can do it. OKW doesn't have any transport Half-Tracks to begin with, so that point is null. LOL Was just an example, kinda missing the point to bring it up TBH, and just said "half track" and kinda meant tech ones Why only quote one example off my entire point? or why do i even ask In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should Sov and Ost have Forward Retreat Points? 17 Sep 2015, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 10:11 AMrobertmikael I think that a vehicle as a forward retreat point is too big advantage for that faction who gets it. For if you could both retreat the troops to it and reinforce them, and at the same time defend that with the vehicle's MGs and also move the vehicle fast from a position to an another position, that could be a huge advantage. sorry you misunderstand, was'nt suggesting that the current halftracks should have a retreat point, was just pointing out they are great as they as and offer their own advantages different to the FRP. basically im saying its fine as it is and im against mirroring factions as a solution to a non problem In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Weird FPS drops/lags17 Sep 2015, 10:11 AM Hmmm never seen that before. Patch isn't out yet so don't think it is that. Was client open for a lot of matches? might be detecting less ram due the the memory leak (misnomer really, not a leak, just resources not being unloaded when not in use) that's my only idea In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should Sov and Ost have Forward Retreat Points? 17 Sep 2015, 09:58 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 09:51 AMrobertmikael It can't be replicating, if the retreat point for 1) USF is the major 2) OKW is the battlegroup headquarters 3) UKF is the forward assembly 4) Ostheer should be the command bunker 5) Sovjets should be the forwards headquarters well it kinda is, albeit with different structures. I mean altogether different from a forward retreat. A tactical advantage that isn't a retreat point, but something else that gives its own advantages comparable to the FRP. lol although come to think of it a good solution would be a vehicle that you could reinforce at that has its offensive abilities reduced when doing so Or just maybe make a mod and reskin OST 5times and finally be happy In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should Sov and Ost have Forward Retreat Points? 17 Sep 2015, 09:46 AM I hate this idea, and ideas like it. Is this any different from "should OKW and USF be able to reinforce off their halftracks?" which is also a bad idea If you believe (#believe)that they have a real disadvantage because of this then a different solution could be good, but simply replicating what the other factions do seems far too dull. Before long we'll just have OST reskinned 5 times for the factions In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer - No Free Green Cover.17 Sep 2015, 09:35 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2015, 19:07 PMHelpingHans So why is it that Ostheer is the only faction that cannot lay heavy cover in the early game? Cons can lay sandbags, RE can lay tank traps, Volks can lay sandbags and IS can lay sandbags as well. Grens and Pios have no such option. Discuss. If the only reason you bring up the inability to build cover with gens is because the other factions can i really don't think that is reason enough, especially not a balance issue. An argument could be made from a design point that it would be more suited to OST with a more defensive dynamic to the faction as apposed to the more mobile factions, but only purely from a design point. This thread and threads like it seem to be getting more and more popular sadly. It's along the same lines as "USF should get heavy's because everyone else does" and the latest "every faction should be given a forward retreat point" But even if a faction has an advantageous design over another i don't think replicating it is a good idea, its not bad, just not good. I like to see more dynamic and inspired solutions if there are in fact problems to be solved In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some thoughts on Sep 17th patch.17 Sep 2015, 09:09 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 01:00 AMZyllen oh stop the BS mate. if you say to me you never hit a mine before i will call you a liar. the difference is that the allies only lose some mp when hitting a mine while the axis can lose entire squads. LOL Jesus Christ fella, where is this coming from,.. its like you formed a reply before you even see what i write. First off never said i never hit mines, didn't even suggest such a thing, but if that did in fact happen i'd say mines need a change. Even with sweepers you still hit mines, hell if you didn't what would be the point in them? just a waste on muni. In fact id say out of everything out there mines, and they way they work within the mechanics, maps, strats and factions are the most solid and dynamic features. There has been a few mis-steps with the damage of some, but after that its effectiveness is purely down to player placement, which is fantastic. FYI i never use sweepers and get owned by mines constantly, but i dont think mines should change, i think i should. And to be honest so should you judging by your reply, if it can in fact be called a reply and not a tantrum. In: COH2 Balance