Profile of ferwiner

I guess it should. Relic went the long way of nerfing every single thing in ukf and it would be ok if not huge buffs axis got. Either one or another or what we will get is just a swap of imbalance.

Haha, I think you haven't faced it that much with its old stats have you? That thing was blatently op.

Would you rather take KT that is godly both against infantry and tanks or croc that is better against inf but sucks against tank? In my opinion AT is worth more late game.

I have played many times against croc based strategy after release and it was always one of two scenarios:
1. I kill the croc and opponent surrenders because he didnt manage to deal enough damage to turn the tide after long wait.
2. I kill the croc sacrifising a lot to do so and then 2nd croc arrives out of nowhere finishing the game.

It means that if the croc was 720/260 it would be no problem as brits would have no chance to build one after another.

What, exactly, changes? Idk cause I'm not really seeing that difference. As compared to, say, t34 going vet2.

How do you play it?

Problem with p4 is that it dies very quickly because every other medium can penetrate it easily. For example the cromwell wins against p4 basically in every situation if they both are on same vet level. Not to mention at-guns have 100% chance to penetrate it. But on the other hand the tank has great AI capabilities and is good for flanking and pushing back infantry, or even wiping it on retreat. Sadly it means overextension. With skirts enemy medium tanks cant penetrate it as easily and it can run to closest stug or pak support. Mind that RoF vet would change nothing as p4 gun has trouble with penetrating tanks, it can ofc but the p4 is mainly the infantry wiping machine. It also has great 5% stacking RoF bulletins that make it crazy vs inf when stacked

As for t-34 I havent seen the tank in game for at least 6 months. But back when it was used it was commonly claimed that p4 vet is much, much better than t-34 one as it couldnt penetrate armor so every vet2 vs vet2 fight ended up with p4 winning. If you ment t-34/85 then it benefits from its vet more than p4 would because it has lower armor and better penetration.

EDIT: You also should remember that zooks penetrate p4 armor quite reliably before vet2. All you need is double zooked REs and a rifle nade and you can kill lone uncoucious p4. I used to play with liut into zook tech for REs some time ago and it was really great against ostheer medium armor. Now with AI tweaks on captain you want even need to tech zooks to get that effect. With skirts zooks have lots of problems to kill p4 unless they are massed. But massed zooks kill even the tiger, so you know...

Large team games are different from 1v1 and 2v2. In late game you meat 2-3 KT in the same moment. Your AT gun still bounce and KT one shots your guns.

All AT guns need cloak in green cover.

If we are talking 3v3 an 4v4 there is no need for usf to have at gun at all, brits and soviets can do this if players arent competent enough to use usf at guns to full potentiall. But on the other hand thanks to 70 range it should be the best at gun on open spaces that happen to exist only in team games. Will it bounce? Ofc, but other at guns wont even shoot at this range. Also dont tell me that all you have when kts arrive is one at gun

Also mind that even without ap shells it still has better pen than p4. And you use p4s to kill tanks, dont you?

Yeah, post game ranks would be really cool. Especially if they would show both pre-match and post-match ranks. Even better - they should show elo. But I doubt it will happen, relics ranking system is slow to response sometime, you have to wait and refresh to get post game ranks from time to time. That means they wont probably show how the ranking looks like including results of last match.