Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: OKW needs a rework17 Mar 2016, 07:47 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2016, 02:28 AMWaegukin Yes, OKW overperforms. Nerf all the things is most definitely not the fix. Why? According to axis only snowflakes, its the ultimate remedy for balance In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript scaling16 Mar 2016, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 20:19 PMBeefSurge Give them more men per squad as they vet. Makes no sense, fixes nothing, 7 useless rifles don't make much of a difference from 6 useless rifles, discourages from using them even more as you end up heavily pop cap taxed by a squad that still does nothing other then feeding vet, but now they don't fit in any kind of cover. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 19:34 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 19:31 PMVonIvan Maybe give it an AP round option like the USF at-gun? And value? Because 30% would put it at PTRS level In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 18:02 PMTAKTCOM They best soviet AT unit. Yeah, civil with stolen panzersherks. CoH2 so CoH2 Just a lil historical tip for you: One of the soviet armies got encircled, didn't surrounded and went partisan tactics instead, training civilians and doing coordinated operations on their own, so yeah, that is kind of military doctrine too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 17:53 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 17:43 PMVuther Give it a timed vet ability that increases its pen at the cost of a litte bit of fire-rate so it won't automatically become useless when mediums hit the field, call it a day and go from there later. USF AT gun has this ability and it doesn't have any drawback to it. Plus, what good is a vet ability, if the thing can't get vet, because it can't penetrate anything bigger then halftruck. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 16:23 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 15:16 PMAerohank You don't pick a doctrine just for M42 light AT guns. That would be silly. You pick Defensive doctrine because it is awesome and has excellent synergy (better than any other doctrine I in my opinion) with a sniper opening. You pick Urban defence if you want to go for a FHQ. Or you can build T2 and have all of that stuff cheaper, more cost effective and for less pop cap. If you feel like using incendiary barrage, there is crapload of better docs, no one builds tank traps. I want to love defensive doctrine, but M-42 performance and 120mm pop cap make me avoid it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 14:23 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 14:09 PMDustBucket look man i know very well that i am a casual player and that you have obviously sunk way more time into this game than i ever have or will, but garrisoning troops isn't solely a utility ability it allows your troops to fight with more protection. It doesn't mean jack if you can live longer if you still can't kill a thing. Vet3 con buff is best example here. They are more durable, but they are still just vet feeders and cappers. You'll simply have combat crippled squad on field longer while you could use a proper infantry or ATG for not really much bigger cost, who actually does the job its meant to do. There is no redeeming factor for M-42. It would still be underpowered even at 160-120 menpower as it would still eat your pop cap rapidly without giving much in return. This is the case of utterly crappy main stats in relation to its cost, not any utility. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Boycotting the game shouldn't be a taboo anymore16 Mar 2016, 14:11 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2016, 03:41 AMDiogenes5 They are going to abandon the game soon enough. I don't think it makes them enough money and is slowly bleeding players. http://steamcharts.com/app/231430 Bleeding players, yet average player count rises and was higher then now only at release month. Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2016, 23:33 PMBulgakov +1 Well, I'd remove m3a1, demo, change Maxims and give riflemen only 1 Lmg. Nerf calli, reduce volks shrek range, stop unit clumping, spread out the maps, add received acccuracy nerf for all blobs and a few other things too. but yeah, f*ck the Brits and their emplacements BS. Or you could just have said "I'd nerf all allies" while pretending charts don't show all armies being more or less equal with axis being in advantage(yet again) in team games above 2s. In: Lobby
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 13:44 PMDustBucket more utility would make it less useless. maybe you are right about the retreat, doesn't add too much. But i think the garrison might give it an interesting ability. Conscripts have merge utility. They still can't engage any other infantry properly. Utility doesn't win engagements. Good stats for the price in relation to other units makes the unit useful, not gimmicks. Every single gimmick based unit falls out of meta instantly for not being reliable enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M-42 vs other light AT.16 Mar 2016, 13:28 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 13:26 PMDustBucket what about giving it the ability to garrison and retreat? Then we'd have overpriced, underperforming, useless AT gun that can garrison and retreat. In: COH2 Balance