Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: I need some BRIT guidance.12 Apr 2016, 15:26 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 15:18 PMalfik Mortar pits have huge range and are very useful at dealing with blobs, especially when they are vetted, which happens quite fast. When the enemy blobs a lot I just build two of them next to each other and that part of the map is off limits for blobs. You just need to think ahead as to where to place them. Losing an emplacement early on hurts quite a lot. Bofors is good for defending your mortar pits and fending off infantry, light and even medium vehicles. Its garrison ability is fuggin great too. It pretty much insta-pins blobs and forces them to either retreat or get decimated. Why do people believe pits get any combat improvements? Vet3 pit is as effective as vet0 pit. The only thing that makes it better is garrison bonus. Vet gives pure survival bonuses. Same goes for bofors. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: I need some BRIT guidance.12 Apr 2016, 15:12 PM Well, either get used to mortar pit or get the proper doctrinal options. Plus, for the shreck blobs, brits have crocs and AVRE. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: I need some BRIT guidance.12 Apr 2016, 14:45 PM 1) Nope. Mattress doctrine only (there is suxton, but you're better of lobbing nades, doing arty shot sounds with your mouth). 2) Whole arty regiment is useless. All others are good. 3) Watch some streams, you can't play brits like USF or sov, so you'll have a shock with the playstyle change. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Are grenadiers worth their 30 MP reinforce cost?12 Apr 2016, 13:44 PM I'll just rephrase what he tried to explain. Explosions AoE could be dodged by units possessing rec acc modifiers. Now the AoEs are tad larger, dmg dropoff is higher, but they always hit. Example: Before the change(which was made long time ago now), squads within sturmtiger AoE could survive uncharmed thanks to rec acc. Now, they all evaporate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are grenadiers worth their 30 MP reinforce cost?12 Apr 2016, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 13:16 PMVuther No, pretty much any main weapons with AoE still uses scatter to determine where the shot lands and how it damages whatever it hits. They don't automatically hit, it's RNG. No change such as that ever happened. He meant the blast AoE, not projectile scatter and accuracy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: People in workshop asking for paypal donations 12 Apr 2016, 12:41 PM Or you can just not donate and keep going with your life? Its not like you need to pay to press that subscribe button... In: Lobby
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 11:58 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 11:32 AMDullahan I wouldn't say that, I think core Soviets can be played very well. Radio Intercept doctrines like NKVD complement this very well, allowing you to have absurdly good awareness of what your opponent is doing. It's great for training fundamental Soviet play and then add the doctrinal stuff in on top of it after you master it. Well, everything works up until certain rank. If your rank is better then 300, then you pretty much have to go full meta as penals, cons(without maxims) and 34/76 will be the fastest ways to lose. Arguably, cons with ppsh are fine, but you need vet3 to see that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 11:00 AMMissCommissar All other factions are more or less universal. They can both in deffensive and offensive game. Look at UK - top defenses, nice infantry, badass tanks. Everything wihtout doctrines, even artillery (no matter that it is garbage). They are 100% universal faction! OKW was pretty same before with TOP tanks in game and dominating infantry, like Ubers. Even poor USF can play in deffensive and offencive. With problems but still. Not really. Each faction have different capabilities in offense and defense, USF have barely anything, soviets rely on defensive mines and demos, remaining three are self explanatory. Soviets stand out, because they are doctrine reliant when it comes to basic infantry scaling, having useful infantry and having useful armor and that is the only major problem, stock equivalents are unusable. USSR can ONLY in offencive gameplay and they are somehow not the best in that role, while they should be because... they lost entire gamestyle, so it should be compensated with more powerfull offencive. But it is not more powerfull, in some part's it is worst! And there is nothing wrong with that. Soviets are supposed to be pressing, aggressive faction that forces opponents into specific units, soviets are really bad in reactive play, which defensive playstyles are reliant on. Only problem with soviets is constant reliance on doctrines and call-ins because stock med armor and stock infantry other then maxims do not deliver at all. So, let USSR be same universal faction as all others. USSR right now is kinda "white crow" in all factions line. And its fine like this. If you want to play more defensively, pick a faction designed for that. Each army has something unique while missing something that is basic for another army. The only army which is truly blessed with everything is OKW, but that doesn't mean the whole faction is imbalanced for that reason. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 10:54 AM What is I told you that its not the lack of defense structures being the reason why people spam maxims? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce Braces Effect/ Mortar Pits less accurate12 Apr 2016, 08:31 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2016, 23:31 PMBananenheld relics game balancer are busy posting 8531s comments on the state of League of Legends in the official League of Legends forum Its called "research" In: COH2 Balance