Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: New Commander patchnotes discussion thread29 Mar 2019, 23:04 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 22:51 PMaddvaluejack Yeah, 5 man PF squad has less DPS than Volks, I didn't get the reason behind the cost increasing. Counteracting spam. You know, the lesson learned very recently thanks to JLI. Also don't look at new PFs as volks. Look at them as obers. They are starting platform, think 70% of efficiency, then you have the upgrade of your choosing to get 100%. Why they are 0 CP then? Imo, because modders desperately try to do literally everything and anything to get OKW an opening that isn't volk spam. In: Lobby
Thread: OST Grens29 Mar 2019, 20:55 PM Have you tried not to face mash that upgrade button on 251 and actually use it to reinforce in combat? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brace Rework29 Mar 2019, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 18:11 PMDonnieChan i want emplacements to be gone forever Everyone does, but don't count on it in CoH2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback29 Mar 2019, 15:33 PM Insatead of making the ability another useless meme, just use current PTAB, +1 to that. In: Lobby
Thread: Elephant and Tiger are useless29 Mar 2019, 15:29 PM Ok. Go do the test 5 times and post a replay for review. Burden of proof lies in the one who makes the claim. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Elephant and Tiger are useless29 Mar 2019, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 15:21 PMExterior Reptile Cruzz stats are OUT-DA-TED And not a single of the stats relevant for this discussion was altered since. They're as up to date as they can be. Also, thank you for putting the quote from my PM to you in your sig, you are proving me correct on that one so hard its not even funny. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Elephant and Tiger are useless29 Mar 2019, 15:19 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 15:13 PMExterior Reptile That's not true. T85 has muchanged better aoe than piss cannon called t76. It wipes models with every shot while t76 misses most of ther time. 2.5 AoE of 85 is "muchanged better aoe" then piss poor 2.5 AoE of 76. Comet also has better aoe than Cromwell and the while phosphorus rounds fuck with AT guns like does big dog with small. So far I haven't been able to do the same with Cromwell. That's surprising, because they have EXACT SAME STATS when it comes to shooting at infantry. Same scatter, same damage, same damage dropoff, same AoE. You're comparing apples to cinnamon. And you're comparing what voices in your head whisper you to what you see on shrooms. P4 is medium generalist and Tiger is heavy generalist. It is literally supposed to be P4 on steroids (except speed). And all the stats support that. More comparable would be Sherman to Perching. And as we all know Pershing is miles ahead of the Sherman in every way. The same cannot be said about Tiger. Pershing is much less durable then tiger while having the same cost, all that fuel and menpower that goes for durability on tiger goes for firepower on pershing. But you didn't knew that as well obviously. Just so we are clear here, when he was busy flaming me on PM yesterday, I did gave him Cruzzis stat page, this thread exists out of sheer ignorance and denial In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Elephant and Tiger are useless29 Mar 2019, 15:09 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 15:02 PMExterior Reptile The Tiger has less DPS than the P4. FULL STOP. I can continue point by point and say more about the Tiger but don't need to. Please don't, because there is only so much bullshit this forum can take and given how you started, I doubt anyone would manage to hear how tiger has less armor and health then P4. Tiger has more DPS then P4 due to having -better penetration -better reload -better AoE -better scatter -better range(more accurate at the same distance) The only thing you can confirm is that you're completely ignorant and clueless about stats and performance of the units you attempt to discussed, but that was already established yesterday, now you're just reinforcing it. Regarding elephant, I'll just leave this here In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback29 Mar 2019, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 14:59 PMCrecer13 Well, we have a unit that a spawn in the enemy's rear without a single ability for something to do in the rear. Now, answer one simple question: for what the hell do I need a spawn behind enemy lines? If you think that howitzer spam in every round is garbage that can be ignored, just rename the Airborne Troops as the Guard and let them spawn like ordinary elite infantry. Reason 1 -to get rid of that support weapon line without any flanking effort Reason 2 -to kill a sniper/squishy unit Reason 3 -to back cap/cut off when things aren't going exactly well for you Don't only 1 unit deployed on field out of all of them has actually anything that can kill a bunker at most? In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback29 Mar 2019, 14:55 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 14:51 PMCrecer13 You are discussing bullshit, you do not need to discuss why the IL-2 strafe is cheaper, you need to discuss the fact that the IL-2 completely mismatches the role of infantrymen spawn in the rear of the enemy. How? Its a vet ability. You'll be after a couple skirmishes before getting it and deploying behind that MG or in front of it does not change the fact that you will have no access to the ability for some time. In: Lobby