Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: How come Axis infantry get all the snares?23 Jul 2019, 07:14 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2019, 06:56 AMullumulu When Satchels are not useable..because only noobs will get a satchels at their tanks..why not give them axis factions too? They have no relevanz and are useless...so axis can have it...right? Sure you can have them, but they come in package with PTRS and have a price of giving up 2 shrecks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 09:29 AMSeductiveCardbordBox Hardcounters Ullu believes exist: 2 Edit: Actually, the very limited number of tank destroyers with no MGs or HE barrages would quality too. My oversight, but that doesn't make this any less absurd. This is a farcical viewpoint ripped from a different game that just doesn't work for CoH2. Why are you still trying to push it? Actually, its more then 2 in his mind exclusively if you -ignore completely- the rule he himself set(and also, its actually 1, exclusively one singular sniper, ost sniper vet1 doesn't fall under his own rule): Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 08:00 AMullumulu (once more: hardcounters means it will beat the unit in every situation and no lose possible: like a stone will ALWAYS lose to a paper.EVERYTIME. no lose possbile to the paper.) TDs without MGs still have a chance to hit infantry, therefore SU-85 is NOT hardcountered by shreck pfussiliers or PGs in his mind. Actually, by his own definition, churchill crocodile is NOT a hardcounter to mainline infantry, who has fausts or HMGs on incendiary rounds facing it(therefore being able to do damage, therefore there being situations where croc will lose "on paper"). In: Lobby
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 09:27 AM And now you're grasping at straws, digging for exceptions, not rules. 66% of snipers in coh2 have capabilities to destroy lights. In: Lobby
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 09:02 AM Ost sniper can kill lights with its vet1, given enough time or vet1 snipers, they'll kill lights, therefore contradicting your very own definition and example. In: Lobby
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 08:44 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 08:41 AMHannibal Do you mean there are no hardcounters in this game? Because the only thing that for infantry is literally impossible to destroy are tanks. *Some infantry. Every infantry with either regular or AT nade can destroy every single vehicle under certain circumstance. Basically the only inf in the whole game that REALLY can't do anything to vehicles are medics. Anyway, he did realized how stupid his point was, that's why he stopped responding despite being very active and quick to reply up until now. In: Lobby
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 08:12 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 08:08 AMullumulu so the paper is overpowerd, because it countert the stone and will be beaten by the scissor..which is beaten by the stone......right?? Is Tiger hardcounter to conscripts? In: Lobby
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 08:03 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 08:00 AMullumulu thats why this TDs are only good counters/ or softcounter.../ counters. Not HARDCOUNTERS. (once more: hardcounters means it will beat the unit in every situation and no lose possible: like a stone will ALWAYS lose to a paper.EVERYTIME. no lose possbile to the paper.) You're again wrong. That's a description of massively overpowered unit, not a hardcounter. The only units in existence that matches your description are flying units vs melee units. In: Lobby
Thread: How come Axis infantry get all the snares?22 Jul 2019, 07:24 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 07:21 AMachpawel And to be honest, you could imagine even more satchel scenarios. That's why it should have some counterpart in axis rooster. Why? Do axis PTRS infantry have problems getting pushed by mediums and not doing any damage? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?22 Jul 2019, 06:58 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2019, 06:35 AMullumulu In my understand a Hardcounter is mostly cheaper or maximal at the same price like the unit it should counter. A hardcounter CANT be expansiver.. it is like you say 180mp pio is Hardcounterd by 600mp unit. maybe it will kill it fast...but the it MUST KILL It because of tripple the price..if not...the 600mp unit is to weak/ pio too strong Jagdtiger and Elephant confirmed to not be hardcounters to anything. No. A hardcounter is a unit(or combination of units in certain cases), which leaves opposing unit with no place to do much and doesn't allow them to efficiently fight back. Cost is only correlation, unless you believe Puma isn't hardcounter to lights or panther isn't a hardcounter to meds too. In: Lobby
Thread: PanzerFusiliers way too combat effective21 Jul 2019, 09:57 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2019, 09:38 AMKiwiBirb Well then why aren’t all the pros doing this kappa Because they are busy spamming command panthers, which is meta and skilled enough to have a fucking clue on how to use puppchen and puma right for AT. In: COH2 Balance