You can never agree upon anything right? All I can see you do is disagree on anything that relates to Allies being good, powerfull or potent, let alone agree with any human being, always knowing whats best not?
I like to argue 
But seriously, there is data that is valid and there is data that is not.
When OMGPOP lost his super long streak, did that translated to USF being suddenly weaker/nerfed even though there was no patch?
When he didn't played for months, did that meant the USF were OP and nothing was changed since day 1 despite few patches?
That is how reliable win streaks are as data source. |
Mark target and call-in tanks are cheaper and much easier 
Anyway, we don't need to talk about this anymore because you know why.
In this case we should just leave this thread as well as we pretty much have noting to add here. |
Spend 40 fuel investing and 45 muni dump constantly just to make that goddamn mortar retreat, very nice argument.
Can I use the same argument with mark target and call-in tanks against panthers?\
I'm pretty sure I can. |
|
^Because MHT is hard.
Every time I read your complaints and arguments I imagine you taking on combined arms with grenadiers only over the red cover. Tanks and infantry alike. Getting an ass whooped, and coming here, refusing that for vast majority of your balance issues you are the biggest problem. |
Well if the alpha is relics version of the illuminati, then it is the worst illuminati ever considering all its secrets are open to public in google 
Then it is a blessing that most community members have no idea how to use it(right, johnnyb?  ) |
It is quite adorable to see people argue for buffs and nerfs for stuff when their world is going to get turned upside down soon~
This is first and likely the only thing I can agree with you on.
Being part of the Illuminati, its indeed amusing to see pawns argue  |
Some guys prefer to deny some stats collected directly from Relic data, by a guy who is well known here.
But there is no problem to trust a guy we don't know at all, with stats with no proof, no reliable method. This guys must be right since he says soviet OP
How INSANE is that?
I'd rather believe beggar who have a documentation then president with random claims.
Its all about the sources and documentation, if you can provide it, you have creditability, if you can't, how can anyone be sure your data is valid if it can't be verified? Correct methodology and sample size is irrelevant if you don't have prove to back it up.
The one who is able to back their statistics with a source will be the one who is going to be listened to. |
OKW highest win rate..no thanks.Sorry its unbelievable.
I know, right?
Hard to believe there are axis players better then you who actually know how to play. |
And zis has 6 men,much more difficult to kill.And paks are easier to clear due to flame arty,shocks better soviet arty etc.
If there is heavy tank directly before your ATG, then where did your heavy tank go? |
Relic get's data the same way the dude in the OP did. Blind reporting on win rates without focusing on a particular skill bracket or organization of players.
You really went over yourself with the bullshit here.
On games I work I can get data on absolutely EVERYTHING effortlessly, player stats, gear, levels, currencies they have etc etc.
And you think relic doesn't have a simple data on win loss ratios for all factions in different brackets?
Are you that stupid when it comes to game design and data tracking? |
Katitoff
jove
Katitoff
Cobra
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
