Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Are kubelwagens OP30 Jun 2015, 18:45 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 18:05 PMTrubbbel WC51 can be the difference between winning and losing. Therefore that commander rocks. ?Not sure if serious. It wouldn't be quite balanced if you need to pick a doctrine and use a doctrinal unit just to counter first thing that arrives on the map. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 18:37 PMBeefSurge Target Weakpoint on Stug is too much. No idea what a good alternative would be though. Capture points or infantry tracking. Ask alex, he'll explain to you how awesome abilities these are and how he always uses them every time he can. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 17:12 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 16:56 PMJohnnyB Size doesn't matter smart boy, if you didn't know, as caliber didn't matter in WW2. T34/85 with its 85 caliber barely reached the Panther's cannon performance which was 75. Same story with IS2 and Tiger 122 against 88. But you couldn't understand notions as projectile velocity, quality of gunpowder or steel quality, anyway.... Otherwise you would not continue to contest the supremacy of krupp steel which was the best like you know it but can't accept it, hehehe. In: Lobby
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 17:11 PM @UP Actually, stug have 60% accuracy to directly hit infantry model, because relic QA is a bunch of chimps if it even exists. That makes it most accurate AI vehicle in the whole game, better accuracy have only flame weapons. While its obvious bug, its there and it doesn't seem like relic is rushing themselves to fix it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 14:57 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 14:45 PMJohnnyB You allied fanboys are allways making me laugh. I can't wait to see your disappointment when your precious little Pershing will be not even of Tiger's caliber not to mention IS2. So no, "axis fanboys" are not fearing Pershing. Panther will dispose of it with no truble at all. And all that axis fanboys will do then, is laugh of your tears. Assuming there will be any pershing, assuming it will be of caliber of -NDA- which belongs to -NDA-, then you'll shit yourself spamming nerf posts. That being said, as I've mentioned it multiple times, I wouldn't want to see pershing. There are many more interesting vehicles to be added. In: Lobby
Thread: US need more now.30 Jun 2015, 14:38 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 21:36 PMAlexzandvar OKW has the least starting MP of any faction, meaning that it being mandatory to build a puppchen as early as possible is hard. Regardless; the fact that you have played against awful players doesn't mean the .50 cal is bad. LT is still the most meta USF officer, and the .50 cal is in the LT tier. There is no reason not to get 1 anymore. The bullshit never ends... All factions have equal amount of starting menpower of around 600 I believe(would need to check at home for accurate number). Its 600(or whatever number) minus starting squad cost, so starting resource wise every single army is equal to each other. OKW have the least raw menpower, because they have most of it already on the field out of any army. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 10:36 AM You're really arguing semantics here. Also, assuming there will be callipoe and assuming it will be able to use its main gun, why do you think it will be "cheap" enough to warrant it being replacement for normal shermans? What stops it from being really effective, but costing say 200 fuel? Would you use 200 fuel sherman in actual tank fights? Also, we have sturmtiger, ostwind, puma, uhu, JT, KT. Neither of them played a large role or was a game changer in any campaign. I hope relics limiting factors are historical accuracy(not stats, presence in the war) for the vehicles and time periods the armies are supposed to represent. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 10:27 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 10:20 AMAradan I play hunderts large team games. USF dont have variabel late game and in team games have disadvantage. In 1v1 or 2v2 this is not problem, but if you looking for large team game 60-80% want play as axis. Want, because they see it. 14-15CP Pershing / Jumbo is way for ballace big games. Allies in general have disadvantage in team games, always had. But no USF new tank will change that. Lack of 320dmg/70 range super heavy TD and ease of teching to and spamming panthers are some of the reasons. In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer HMG too strong now30 Jun 2015, 10:14 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 10:08 AMEsxile What are you talking about? Calling blobb noober anybody who's not saying the MG is fine becomes a really boring argumentation. I wonder if you can guess his gren playstyle. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 09:56 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2015, 19:28 PMAradan One faction with huge disadvantage in late game, is asymetrical ballance. Simply play axis in large team games as we all. That argument had any base before latest patch, where you could field multiple heavies. Right now, it doesn't as jacksons and multiple shermans are enough to deal with single heavy. Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 09:22 AMMr. Someguy That's interesting, especially because it goes against the current rules of mobile artillery, which are generally fragile units. The most durable being the Stuka and Priest. Yet this is a Medium Tank with long-range rockets attached. StuKa zu fuss and priest already go against it as you've mentioned. Scott also doesn't hold to the principle of katy/pwerfer firmly. I could argue sturmtiger as well, while not particularly long ranges, its still a mobile arty. There is also a KV-2 crying somewhere in a dark, forgotten corner. There is plenty of room for improvement. In: Lobby