Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Pacific Front10 Sep 2015, 07:27 AM Some people had way too much World of Tanks and believe they actually had armor Infantry quality was also quite horrible, to make it accurate, it would have to be 10 man osttruppen quality squads with no retreat option. Japan won't happen, because the only place where they ever had any chance was at sea and early in the air and coh2 doesn't support that. In: Lobby
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 17:42 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 17:28 PMHux Yeah you're right I'm sure they designed the voice files and UI to intentionally mislead us about having access to the wrong units because thats the hallmark of great faction design, right? Having to rearrange stuff afterwards... If you don't think these errors are evidence of poor initial design then I'm at a loss for what you think is going on. #BrainFart Soviet T3 says about getting medium tanks. There is no medium tank in soviet T3. Its all part of conspiracy to mislead us into believing there is stuff that isn't there in reality! Or... there were changes somewhere along the road... In the meanwhile, here, take this. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 16:36 PM5trategos The UKF proves that we don't need to rely on silly resource gimmicks or handicapped armies to create interesting gameplay variations (OKW and USF). I don't think you've played enough 1v1 as brits since you're saying that The UKF play with a full hand, a tool for every situation. Player choice is rewarded and as a result the gameplay is very satisfying. OST is the only other faction that comes close. Design is great. Balance is another story. Actually, they don't have reliable, mobile indirect fire in any way, infantry or mechanized on the stock configuration, all other armies have both. While not all armies are supposed to have everything, you have no way to break strong defensive line without doctrine. That is a small design flaw. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M36 Jackson vs Firefly9 Sep 2015, 12:37 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 12:26 PMFiresparks I've had much better result with the firely than I do with the jackson. However, that could be also be due to the overall much better brit ATG and tank. Yea, brit ATG is pretty damn good save for vet1 ability. FF itself without tulips is meeeh at best. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 12:04 PMmycalliope Stay in place=get rekt. Move=safe. Micro=good. No micro=lost vehicle. this was your point it totally supports the point that if you micro u can easily dodge cas..so thats ur contradcition alright got it Secondly the cas has gotten another nerf in indriect from stagger time and two lwo damage planes which was not needed since players are not getting punished for not keeping up their micro and the player who reocns and places this strafes for muni is not being rewarded Even the best micro in the world won't help you if you don't have time to react. No contradiction here. CAS isn't affected with 2 planes, SCAS from other doctrines, the loitering plane is. You don't even know which changes you're talking about and what they affect and you're trying to enforce your opinion here? In: Lobby
Thread: M36 Jackson vs Firefly9 Sep 2015, 12:16 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 23:20 PMFiresparks I would rather see the Firefly be cheaper than getting a buff. the firefly is more comparable to the much cheaper jackson without factoring in the Tulip rockets. 440mp 155 fuel for a 640hp and 160 armor is rather unforgiving, regardless of its dps. FF isn't really comparable to jackson if we take away tulips from equation. Jackson is vastly superior to it with vet1, RoF, mobility, even survivability(more HP and armor means nothing if you can't get out of there-also, engine crew repairs) and obviously, firepower, Jackson having ~1.6 times the DPS of FF. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 11:47 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 11:41 AMmycalliope lol if that is your reasoning then why were you complaining about CAS earlier..??? lol contradicting your own point and we are done here folks Complaining? It was overpowered doctrine. It gave you no time to react. It got nerfed. Everyone sane said its overpowered. Loitering SCAS was also overpowered, everyone and their dog knew it, it got nerfed. I don't see any contradictions in what I've said earlier, because there are none. You're grasping at straws here. In: Lobby
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 11:40 AM Faction design and doctrine design is definitely the best up to date. Balance is for another thread. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 11:14 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 11:01 AMmycalliope the new delay makes it worse that was my point so a little increase in damage is required to compensate now the stagger time give player more opportunity to move there units on top of the 1.5 second delay nerf it got......its like putting a silver spoon in the mouth of allies...they should be punished if they cant keep up micro after all these changes Overpowered ability was nerfed then? I'd call that balance! Stay in place=get rekt. Move=safe. Micro=good. No micro=lost vehicle. This is how it works. Problem? In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 10:48 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 10:46 AMmycalliope brad the new close air support is not good as previous That was the whole point of change. Old deals 120, new one deals 60x2 and you want to buff it? Get a grip. In: Lobby